green
Positive treatment
Doctrinal family: Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Ra… ↗
Issue: fair use doctrineCA ↗
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Cited for
where an order not itself appealable served as "the reason" for an appealable injunctive order, this Court reviewed the underlying order as part and parcel of the appealable order
- United States v. John E. McKenzie Dale Bonura, Stephen Farrar, Stephen Reboul, Ronald F. Brink, Thomas R. Woodall & Richard Leblanc v. Cbs, Inc., Movant-Appellant. In Re Cbs, Inc., United States of Am. v. John E. McKenzie Dale Bonura, Stephen Farrar, Stephen Reboul, Ronald F. Brink, Thomas R. Woodall & Richard Leblanc v. Cbs, Inc., Movant-Appellant. In Re Cbs, Inc., in Re Cbs, Inc., Contempt of Court. United States of Am. v. Cbs, Inc., 735 F.2d 907 (5th Cir. 1984). (where an order not itself appealable served as "the reason" for an appealable injunctive order, this Court reviewed the underlying order as part and parcel of the appealable order)
- United States v. McKenzie, 735 F.2d 907 (5th Cir. 1984). (where an order not itself appealable served as "the reason” for an appealable injunctive order, this Court reviewed the underlying order as part and parcel of the appealable order)
'the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary'
- Indus. Commc'ns Sys., Inc. v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 505 F.2d 152 (9th Cir. 1974). ('the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary')
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary”
- Indus. Commc'ns Sys., Inc. v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 505 F.2d 152 (9th Cir. 1974). “the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary”
Other citing cases
- Robinson v. Random House, Inc., 877 F. Supp. 830 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).
- Centel Commc'ns Co. v. Comm'r, 92 T.C. 612 (Tax Ct. 1989).
- Burdick v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 675 P.2d 922 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984).
- Walt Disney Prods. v. The Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carter
v.
American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
v.
American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
No. 772.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1967.
385 U.S. 1008
1967 U.S. LEXIS 2648
William VanDercreek for petitioners., Wayne Babler and Leroy Jeffers for American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al., and Spencer C. Relyea III for General Telephone Co. of the Southwest, respondents.
Cited by 172 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (4)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.