green
Positive treatment
Issue: immediate cautionary instructionDC ↗
Issue: immediate instructionDC ↗
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clara B. Penn, A/K/A Clara B. Alexander
(2×)
See Rivas v. United States, 368 F.2d 703, 710 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 980 , 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mary Ann Himmelwright
See Rivas v. United States, 368 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 980 , 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Malcolm Cameron
(2×)
Henderson v. United States, 390 F.2d 805, 808 (9th Cir. 1967); see Rivas v. United States, 368 F.2d 703, 710 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 980 , 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Robert Hay
See United States v. Thompson, 366 F.2d 167 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 980 , 17 L.Ed.2d 875 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark
See generally, Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959) , Ford v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 259 , 352 F.2d 927, 929-932 (C.A.D.C., 1965), and Hagan v. United States, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 276 , 364 F.2d 669, 672 (C.A.D.C., 1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 979 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 875 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United States
See Suarez, supra note 17, at 178. 32 Supra note 10, 114 U.S.App.D.C. at 124, 312 F.2d at 851 33 Coleman v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 246 , 249, 371 F.2d 343, 345-346 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 979 , 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967) The writer of this opinion would make the following observations for himself.
discussed
Cited "see"
George E. Ross, Jr. v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, United States District Judge
(2×)
See Coleman v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 246 , 371 F.2d 343 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 979 , 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Seibel
(2×)
See, e.g., Rivas v. United States, 368 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 945 (1967) (holding before Montoya that "a clear indication" is between a mere chance and probable cause); People v. Williams, 192 Colo. 249 , 557 P.2d 399 (1976) (following Rivas ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria Vega-Barvo
(2×)
Compare United States v. Cameron, 538 F.2d 254 (9th Cir.1976) (forced enema was unreasonable search) with Rivas v. United States, 368 F.2d 703 (9th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 980 , 17 L.Ed.2d 875 (1967) (forced rectal probe was reasonable search) and Lee v. Winston, 717 F.2d 888 (4th Cir.1983) (forced surgical procedure to remove bullet in chest violates Fourth Amendment); with United States v. Crowder, 543 F.2d 312 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 788 , 50 L.Ed.2d 779 (1977) (forced surgical procedure to remove bullet in forearm does not v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 844.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1967.
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.