Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Director v. Commissioner
Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County, supra. Although it is not absolute, grand jury secrecy "is zealously guarded because the confidentiality of its proceedings must be insured if it is to continue to be effective." Matter of Carey [Fisher], 68 A.D.2d 220 , 416 N.Y.S.2d 904 (1979) ; accord People v. McDoo, 45 Misc.2d 664 , 257 N.Y.S.2d 763 (1965) , affd. without opinion 51 Misc.2d 263 , 272 N.Y.S. 2d 412 (1966) , cert. denied 386 U.S. 1031 (1967) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation
(2×)
"Section 17(9) (renumbered as § 17(10), recodified as § 10325) provides that after an application for rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration has been denied or otherwise disposed of, a suit may be brought to enforce, enjoin, suspend, or set aside the Commission decision, order, or requirement." Atlantic, supra, 383 U.S. at 582-83 , 86 S.Ct. at 1005 (footnote omitted); see United States v. Southern Ry., 364 F.2d 86, 92-93 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967); Southern Ry. v. United States, 412 F.Supp. 1122 , 1134-35 & n. 31 (D.D.C.1976); but …
cited
Cited "see"
The Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
See United States v. Southern Railway Company, 364 F.2d 86, 94-95 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967). 8 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Sweat
See, e.g., United States v. Southern Railway Co., 364 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1966), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
General Mills, Inc. v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Southern Ry., 364 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1031 , 87 S.Ct. 1479 , 18 L.Ed.2d 592 (1967). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burbridge
v.
California
v.
California
No. 875.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 8, 1967.
Seymour Farber for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Gmnucci, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Published
App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of S. F. and/or Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.