Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackfeet Tribe of Indians v. Groff
See Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. Nordwick, 378 F.2d 426, 432 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1046 , 88 S.Ct. 764 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968); Baur v. Mathews, 578 F.2d 228, 233 (9th Cir.1978); Castillo-Felix v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 601 F.2d 459, 465 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackfeet Tribe of Indians v. Groff
See Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. Nordwick, 378 F.2d 426, 432 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1046 , 88 S.Ct. 764 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968); Baur v. Mathews, 578 F.2d 228, 233 (9th Cir.1978); Castillo-Felix v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 601 F.2d 459, 465 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1, 3 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968) (ASCAP, common agent for over 8,000 musicians, held not to be an agreement in restraint of trade).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1, 4 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968) (ASCAP, common agent for over 8,000 musicians, held not to be an agreement in restraint of trade).
cited
Cited "see"
Tempo Music, Inc., Robbins Music Corporation, Remick Music Corporation, and Mills Music, Inc. v. James D. Myers
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers
See also ASCAP v. Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc., 912 F.2d at 570 (noting that “context” of 1950 Decree reflects intent to “disinfect” ASCAP “as a potential combination in restraint of trade____”) (quoting K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1, 4 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968)); cf. United States v. County of Nassau, 907 F.2d 397 (2d Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (affirming refusal to modify decree, in part based on conclusion that change “would undermine the purpose of the decree”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bramlett
v.
Leber, Governor of the Canal Zone and President, Panama Canal Co.
v.
Leber, Governor of the Canal Zone and President, Panama Canal Co.
No. 732.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1968.
389 U.S. 1046
1968 U.S. LEXIS 2812
Thomas Morton Gittimgs, Jr., for petitioners., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Alan S. Rosenthal and Richard S. Salzman for respondent.
Cited by 53 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.