Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Timely objection to denial of this right [to a written transcript] - requires reversal of a conviction if an accused was prejudiced by the denial”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · "Timely objection to denial of this right [to a written transcript] requires reversal of a conviction if an accused was prejudiced by the denial"
74 citation events across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lawrence D'AllesAnDro v. United States (ca2, 1975-05-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Lawrence D'AllesAnDro v. United States (2×)
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 , 198 (2 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969); United States v. Weinstein, 452 F.2d 704 , 712—13 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied sub nom., Grunberger v. United States, 406 U.S. 917 , 92 S.Ct. 1766 , 32 L.Ed.2d 116 (1972); United States v. Weinstein, 511 F.2d 622 , 626—627 (2 Cir. 1975), petition for certiorari filed.
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,385 United States of America v. Sidney Stein and Security Underwriting Consultants, Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192, 196 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Blanden (2×)
E.D. Pa. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U. S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969); Fleming v. United States, 378 F.2d 502 (1st Cir. 1967). “[Bjefore Rule 48(b) can be invoked there must be a showing that the delay prejudiced the defendant’s ability to rebut the government’s case, or that the delay was caused by oppressive governmental action.” United States v. Dooling, supra, 406 F.2d at page 196.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dallago (2×)
E.D.N.Y · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James Bernard Singleton (4×)
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
Furthermore, the Government was prepared to go to trial in April, 1971, when Morris was able to testify, but the trial was postponed at the defendant's request, see United States v. Persico, 425 F.2d 1375, 1385 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 869 , 91 S.Ct. 102 , 27 L.Ed.2d 108 (1970). 14 Because the primary purpose of Rule 48(b) is to enforce the right to a speedy trial, Pollard, supra, 352 U.S. at 361 n. 7, 77 S.Ct. 481 ; see also, United States v. Dooling, 406 F.2d 192, 196 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, Persico v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 , 89 S.Ct. 1744 , 23 L.Ed.2d 224 (1969), no special at…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Persico
v.
United States
No. 1187.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1969.
395 U.S. 911
✓ 23 L. Ed. 2d 225
Maurice Edelbaum for Pérsico, Robert Kasanof for Albanese, Frances Thaddeus Wolff for Spero, and Edmund A. Rosner for McIntosh, petitioners., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Charles Ruff for the United States.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 23 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 88%
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.