Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Lavoie
See Freije v. United States, 386 F.2d 408, 411 (1st Cir.1967), ce rt. denied, 396 U.S. 859 , 90 S.Ct. 137 , 24 L.Ed.2d 111 (1969); Fed.R.Crim.P. 30.
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael A. Borodine v. Edward Douzanis, Superintendent, M. C. I. Concord
Miranda warnings are required only when there has been such a restriction on a person’s freedom as to render him ‘in custody.’ It was that sort of coercive environment to which Miranda by its terms was made applicable, and to which it is limited.” (Emphasis in original.) And, as this circuit has recognized, the applicability of Miranda must be determined by an objective rather than a subjective test, “requiring] at least some objective manifestation that the defendant was ‘deprived of his freedom of action in [a] significant way’, ” Fisher v. Scafati, 439 F.2d 307, 310 (1st Cir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
(2×)
Childs v. State, 491 S.W.2d 907, 909 (Tex.Crim.App.1973) (evidence one defendant committed aggravated robbery just hours prior to committing offense at issue did not warrant severance when jury was properly instructed), overruled on other grounds, Ward v. State, 591 S.W.2d 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1978) (op. on reh'g); Olivares v. State, 785 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1990, no pet.) (jury instruction was sufficient to prevent error when evidence was admitted to prove co-defendant was in possession of drug paraphernalia at time of arrest); Simon v. State, 743 S.W.2d 318, 322 (Tex. App.—Hous…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Teplitsky
v.
Bureau of Employees' Compensation, U. S. Department of Labor
v.
Bureau of Employees' Compensation, U. S. Department of Labor
No. 279.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.