green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“the trademark licensor owes an affirmative duty to the public to assure that in the hands of his licensee the trade-mark continues to represent that which it purports to represent.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States Ex Rel. Joy v. Resor
But see Cortwright v. Resor, 447 F.2d 245, 250-51 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Midwest Plastic Fabricators, Inc. v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
the trademark licensor owes an affirmative duty to the public to assure that in the hands of his licensee the trade-mark continues to represent that which it purports to represent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Microsoft Corp. v. Manning
Tex.R.Civ.P. 42(d)(1); see Cortright v. Resor, 325 F.Supp. 797, 808 (E.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 447 F.2d 245 (2nd Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972) (con struing Federal Rule 23(c)(4)(A)); St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Metromedia Broadcasting Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 52 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); Kypta v. McDonald’s Corp., 671 F.2d 1282 , 1285 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 857 , 103 S.Ct. 127 , 74 L.Ed.2d 109 (1982); Casey, 590 F.Supp. at 1571-2; see also United States Steel Corp. v. Fortner Enters., Inc., 429 U.S. 610 , 97 S.Ct. 861 , 51 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
3 P.M., Inc. v. Basic Four Corp.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); c.f.
discussed
Cited "see"
F. E. L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); cf. Tire Sales Corp. v. Cities Service Oil Co., 410 F.Supp. 1222, 1227 (N.D.Ill.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Electroglas, Inc. v. Dynatex Corp.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 52 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Neal v. Secretary of the Navy
See generally Cortright v. Resor, 325 F.Supp. 797, 814-15 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d. on other grounds, 447 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacobs v. Stetson
See Cortright v. Resor, 447 F.2d 245 , 254 (2nd Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972) also quoting Chief Justice Warren, The Bill of Rights and the Military, 37 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 181, 186 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Colburn v. Roto-Rooter Corp.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). .
cited
Cited "see"
Krehl v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 46 (9th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Company, Inc.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Benjamin Spock v. Bert A. David, Commander, Fort Dix Military Reservation, and James r.schelsinger, Secretary of Defense
See Cortright v. Resor, 325 F.Supp. 797, 810 (E.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 447 F.2d 245 , 250-251 (2d Cir. 1971), cert denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Butler v. United States
See Cortright v. Resor, 325 F.Supp. 797, 811-812 (E.D.N.Y.1971), rev’d — on other *1044 grounds, 447 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied. 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972) ; CCCO-Western Region v. Fellows, supra (semble). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United Farm Workers National Union v. Sloan's Supermarkets, Inc.
See Cortright v. Resor, 447 F.2d 245, 254 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); Farnum v. International Ass’n of Machinists, 161 F.Supp. 391 (S.D.N.Y.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 916 , 78 S.Ct. 1364 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1363 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin Spock v. Bert A. David, Commander, Fort Dix Military Reservation, and Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense
See Cortright v. Resor, 325 F.Supp. 797, 808-811 (E.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 447 F.2d 245 , 250-251 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); Murray v. Vaughn, 300 F.Supp. 688, 695 (D.R.I.1969); Note, The Constitutional Implications of the Jurisdictional Amount Provision in Injunction Suits Against Federal Officers, 71 Colum.L.Rev. 1474 (1971); cf. West End Neighborhood Corp. v. Stans, 5 312 F.Supp. 1066, 1068 (D.D.C.1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Cohen & Son, Inc. v. All American Hero, Inc.
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. den., 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Company
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972) (the defendant franchisor was charged with unlawfully tying its franchise license with the purchase of its restaurant supplies).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Co.
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972) (the defendant franchisor was charged with unlawfully tying its franchise license with the purchase of its restaurant supplies).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pugh v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See also Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 2855, Afge Afl-Cio) v. United States
See also Cortright v. Resor, 447 F.2d 245 (2 Cir. 1971), Cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); note 10 Supra.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 2855, AFGE (AFL-CIO) v. United States
See also Cortright v. Resor, 447 F.2d 245 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); note 10 supra. Accord, AFGE, Local 1858 v. Hoffman, supra, 427 F.Supp. at 1082 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Motor Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., International Association of Holiday Inns, Intervenor-Defendant
See also Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp., 204 F.2d at 331, 335 (2d Cir. 1953). 59 . 448 F.2d 43 , 51 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). 60 . 506 F.2d 934 , 942-43 (5th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. First National City Bank
See also, Cortright v. Resor, 447 F.2d 245, 254 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); General Fireproofing Co. v. Wyman, 444 F.2d 391, 393 (2 Cir. 1971); O’Reilly v. Wyman, 305 F.Supp. 228, 231 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (per Moore, C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. Laird
Compare Yahr v. Resor, 339 F.Supp. 964 (E.D.N.C.1972) and Post v. Payton, 323 F.Supp. 799 (E.D.N.Y. 1971) with Fifth Avenue Peace Parade Committee v. Hoover, 327 F.Supp. 238 (S.D.N.Y.1971) and Cortright v. Resor, 325 F.Supp. 797 (E.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 447 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 965 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972). 6 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cortright
v.
Froehlke, Secretary of the Army
v.
Froehlke, Secretary of the Army
No. 71-814.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1972.
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certi-orari should be granted.