green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance
Compare 106 Forsyth Corp. v. Bishop, 362 F.Supp. 1389 (M.D.Ga.1972), aff’d, 482 F.2d 280 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1044 , 95 S.ct. 2660, 45 L.Ed.2d 696 (1975), finding no first amendment violation in the revocation of a movie theater’s license for up to twelve months after a determination at a prior adversary hearing that obscene films had been shown, and Grove Press, Inc. v. Flask, 326 F.Supp. 574 (N.D.Ohio 1970) (three-judge court), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of intervening decisions, 413 U.S. 902 , 93 S.Ct. 3026 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1973), uphold…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grove Press, Inc.
v.
Flask
v.
Flask
No. 70-1.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1973.
Ante, Appeal, Brennan, California, Consideration, Inconsistent, Marshall, Proceedings, Remand, Slaton, Stewart, Theatre, Took, Vacate.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Judgment vacated and[*903] case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand case for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.