Riedlinger v. Steam Bros., Inc. (N.D. 2013). · Go Syfert
Riedlinger v. Steam Bros., Inc. (N.D. 2013). Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Doppler (nd, 2013-04-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Doppler
N.D. · 2013 · confidence medium
A party resisting the motion for summary judgment “cannot merely rely on the pleadings or other unsupported conclusory allegations, but must present competent admissible evidence by affidavit or other comparable means which raises an issue of material fact.” Riedlinger v. Steam Brothers, Inc. , 2013 ND 14, ¶ 10 (quoting Burris Carpet Plus, Inc. v. Burris , 2010 ND 118, ¶¶ 10-11 , 785 N.W.2d 164 (citations omitted)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Riedlinger
v.
Steam Brothers, Inc.
20120111.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Jan 28, 2013.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Filed 1/28/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2013 ND 15

Dakota Heritage Bank, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Michael J. Iaccone, Trustee for the

Willard L. Pankonin bankruptcy estate,

Christi J. Pankonin, a/k/a Kristi J.

Pankonin, Laverle Carstensen,

Paul Modell, Marjorie Modell,

and Punchco, Inc., Defendants

Christi J. Pankonin, Appellant

and

Ralph Rivinius and LorRaine

Rivinius, Interested Parties

No. 20120335

Appeal from the District Court of Logan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Roger J. Minch, 10 Roberts Street, P.O. Box 6017, Fargo, N.D. 58108-6017, for plaintiff and appellee.

Timothy C. Lamb, P.O. Box 5562, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5562, for defendant and appellant.

Dakota Heritage Bank v. Pankonin

No. 20120335

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Christi Pankonin appeals a district court order denying a Rule 60, N.D.R.Civ.P., motion for relief from summary judgment.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) (the district court did not abuse its discretion).

[¶2] Assuming, without deciding, that the district court properly entered its subsequent order on request for sanctions, that order was not appealed, so it is not before us, and we do not decide it.

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

William F. Hodny, S.J.

[¶4] The Honorable William F. Hodny, Surrogate Judge, sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.