green
Positive treatment
Doctrinal family (anchor): Winters v. Bohanon ↗
Issue: work product doctrineDC ↗
Issue: agency ruleAK ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“investment contract" not void for vagueness "in light of the many supreme court decisions defining and applying the term”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jamie Matlick Farris, United States of America v. Marcus Theodore Baumann, United States of America v. Carl Richard Tamuty
investment contract" not void for vagueness "in light of the many supreme court decisions defining and applying the term
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
File Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
Co., 480 F.2d 1047, 1056 (2nd Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.ct. 1410, 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974); Adams v. FTC, 296 F.2d 861 , 866-67 (8th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 864 , 82 S.Ct. 1029 , 8 L.Ed.2d 83 (1962); Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc. v. FTC, 286 F.2d 803, 811 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 877 , 81 S.Ct. 1027 , 6 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961); Chapman v. Maren Elwood College, 225 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1955); Comet Electronics, Inc. v. United States, 381 F.Supp. 1233, 1242 (W.D.Mo.1974), affirmed, 420 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 1439 , 43 L.Ed.2d 758 (1975); Genuine Parts Co. v. FTC,…
cited
Cited "see"
Terry A. Garvin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See id. at 2 6 In fact, Appellants characterize these changes as "Minor Changes" in their opening brief to this court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Middleton v. United States
See United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311, 315-18 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974).] Nor do we agree with appellant’s suggestion that the disputed rulings conflicted with the principles of the attorney-client privilege.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Andrew Shovea, Gebbie Hugh Robba, Stephen Howard Gaias, Jr.
See generally, United States v. Smaldone, 10 Cir., 484 F.2d 311 -18, cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred Arthur Lane, III and William Kent Jones
See generally United States v. Smaldone, 10 Cir., 484 F.2d 311, 311-18 , cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Marvin Corrigan
See United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States
See United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311, 318 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974); United States v. Baker, supra. See also Jones v. United States, D.C.App., 343 A.2d 346, 352 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pamela Mejia Armenta Iglesias
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311, 320-21 (10th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974); Wolford v. United States, 401 F.2d 331, 333 (10th Cir.1968). 42 The 1975 amendment to Rule 16 replaced the permissive language with mandatory language.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Walter C. Mehlenbacher
See, e. g., SEC v. Brigadoon Scotch Disk Co., 480 F.2d 1047, 1053 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1410 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alexander
See, e. g., United States v. Tager, 481 F.2d 97, 100 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 914 , 94 S.Ct. 1410 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 , reh. denied, 416 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1962 , 40 L.Ed.2d 302 (1974) (“[ujnder the 1970 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3500 , the defendant has no right to pre-trial discovery of statements made by government witnesses to the grand jury” (footnote omitted); United States v. Budzanoski, 462 F.2d 443, 454 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 271 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972) (the 1970 amendment to the Jencks Act does not affect pretrial discovery of grand jury t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Felice
Idem. “ * * * The language of the rule suggests that the *85 only purpose of this provision is to prevent the flight of a defendant or his associates. * * * ” 8 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d ed.) 6-83, ¶ 6.05; see also United States v. Smaldone, C.A. 10th (1973), 484 F.2d 311, 320 [15], certiorari denied (1974), 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 . (“ * * * [A]n . indictment may under Rule 6(e) be kept secret in order to avoid fleeing from justice. * * * ”) This Court does not condone any breach of the clear mandate of Rule 6(e)(3), supra, by anyone, if in fact such did oc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smaldone v. United States
In addition, in urging a change of venue for trial, “Young Gene” and his father claimed “that the name Smaldone is so closely associated with crime and violence in the Colorado area that any possibility of a fair trial was nonexistent,” United States v. Smaldone, 485 F.2d at 1345 ; see also United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311, 319, n. 5 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
See also SEC v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., 480 F.2d 1047, 1052-53 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1410 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974); FTC v. Gibson, 460 F.2d 605, 608 (5th Cir. 1972). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Lee Harper
See also United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311, 319-20 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974) and United States v. Miller, 387 F.Supp. 1097, 1098 (D.Conn.1975), where slightly different reasoning nonetheless led the courts to the same conclusion that Congress had not acted arbitrarily.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Amidzich
See also, United States v. Smaldone, 484 F.2d 311, 319-320 (10th Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 415 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 1411 , 39 L.Ed.2d 469 (1974); United States v. Miller, 387 F. Supp. 1097 (D.Conn.1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Winters
v.
Bohanon, U. S. District Court Judge
v.
Bohanon, U. S. District Court Judge
No. 73-673.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1974.
415 U.S. 914
1974 U.S. LEXIS 1164
Cited by 150 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.