“tf contested at all, the existence of the rico enterprise would involve proof simply of the 'legal' existence of the corporation, partnership or other legal form of organization charged.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Delano
tf contested at all, the existence of the rico enterprise would involve proof simply of the 'legal' existence of the corporation, partnership or other legal form of organization charged.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble Enterprises
legal entities are garden-variety 'enterprises' which generally pose no problem of separateness from the predicate acts
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Feldman
See United States v. Griffin, 660 F.2d 996, 999 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 313 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert B. Bowman
See United States v. Womack, 654 F.2d 1034, 1040 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phibbs
See, e.g., United States v. Womack, 654 F.2d 1034 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982) (breach of conditions placed on sequestration constitutes violation of Fed.R.Evid. 615). 114 Phibbs, however, asserts that government counsel really wanted Finken and Merryman in court so that they might be in a position to coach Parks during recesses, or to otherwise guide his testimony.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phibbs
See, e.g., United States v. Womack, 654 F.2d 1034 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982) (breach of conditions placed on sequestration constitutes violation of Fed.R.Evid. 615).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hughes
See United States v. Riccobene, 709 F.2d 214 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Ciancaglini v. United States, 464 U.S. 849 , 104 S.Ct. 157 , 78 L.Ed.2d 145 (1983); compare United States v. Griffin, 660 F.2d 996 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Garonzik v. United States, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 313 (1982) with United States v. Tillett, 763 F.2d 628 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kane
See, e.g., United States v. Daniel, 813 F.2d 661 (5th Cir.1987) (separation of powers not violated by delegation to Attorney General of power to reclassify controlled substances, even though such reclassification affected maximum penalty for distribution of substances); see also United States v. Womack, 654 F.2d 1034 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982); United States v. Gordon, 580 F.2d 827, 840 (5th Cir), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1051 , 99 S.Ct. 731 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 711 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Womack, 654 F.2d 1034 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982); United States v. Gordon, 580 F.2d 827, 840 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1051 , 99 S.Ct. 731 , 58 L.Ed.2d 711 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nunes v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
See also United States v. Griffin, 660 F.2d 996, 999 (4th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 313 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Covelli, David Frederick and Darwin Murray
See, e.g., United States v. Womack, 654 F.2d 1034, 1040 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1156 , 102 S.Ct. 1029 , 71 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Womack
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-5788.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · W.D. New York (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.