Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Orozco
But see United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 451-52 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Broussard
McKinney, 53 F.3d at 674 ; see United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 453 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982) (mixed verdicts indicate jury engaged in careful weighing of evidence against each defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmen Rosa Behety, Felino Ramirez-Valdez
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 455-56 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (DEA’s notification of Panamanian authorities regarding suspected crash of plane carrying cocaine insufficient to trigger Fourth Amendment protections), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Heller, 625 F.2d 594, 599-600 (5th Cir.1980) (tip from United States officials to British police regarding defendant insufficient to trigger Fourth Amendment); Morrow, 537 F.2d at 140 (communication between United States and Canadian law enforcement officials of name and number of in…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bailey
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 443 (5th Cir. Unit B Nov. 1981) (upholding selection process which resulted in under-representation of one division by approximately 2 grand jurors and over-representation of another division by approximately 1.5 grand jurors on an average panel of 23 members), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Maskeny, 609 F.2d 183, 191 (5th Cir.) (rejecting challenge based on under-representation of division by 3 grand jurors), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 3010 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); see also Gregory…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrazana
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982). 6 III.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrazana
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982). 6 III.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence Evans
See United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077, 1083 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982) (defendant argued that sales slips bearing his name for vans used to move marijuana should have been excluded as hearsay; the court stated that “the sales slips were not admitted to prove that [defendant] bought the vans.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Chavez Robert Clarke, AKA Bnd or Robert Clark Melaquias Sandoval Patrick Henry Zanzucchi Robert Matthew Zanzucchi
See Burt, 765 F.2d at 1367 (citing United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 451-52 (5th Cir.1981) (dicta), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Braj Nandan Singh
(2×)
Accord United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077 , 1082 n. 10 (2d Cir.) (“ ‘border search’ exception does not justify searches of homes or business establishments”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickey
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 , 457 U.S. 1137 , 102 S.Ct. 2967 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982); United States v. Watson, supra at 1340 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickey
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 , 457 U.S. 1137 , 102 S.Ct. 2967 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982); United States v. Watson, supra at 1340.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King v. State
Rather, the key to satisfying [Federal Evidence] Rule 803(6) in this context is whether an employee was "able in some way to verify the information provided-for example, by examining a credit card, driver's license, or other form of identification." United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95, 101 (2d Cir.1980). "[Ilf such verification is obtained by the employee, we see no reason why the guest card that has been filled in by the guest himself would not qualify as a business record and thus be admissible for the truth of its statements." Id.; see also United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077, 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas
Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 364 , 99 S.Ct. 664, 668 , 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979); see also United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 442 (5th Cir.1981) (quoting Duren), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nathaniel Mathes v. United States
Slaughter v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2084 , 104 L.Ed.2d 648 (1989); United States v. Jordan, 810 F.2d 262, 264 (D.C.Cir.) (citing United States v. Lemonakis,, 485 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 989 , 94 S.Ct. 1586 , 39 L.Ed.2d 885 (1974)), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 1963 , 95 L.Ed.2d 535 (1987); see also United States v. Saint Prix,, 672 F.2d 1077, 1083 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Bruner, 657 F.2d 1278, 1284-85 (D.C.Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Orlando Zapata
Rather, the key to satisfying Rule 803(6) in this context is whether an employee was “able in some way to verify the information provided— for example, by examining a credit card, driver’s license, or other form of identification.” United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95, 101 (2d Cir.1980). “[I]f such verification is obtained by the employee, we see no reason why the guest card that has been filled in by the guest himself would not qualify as a business record and thus be admissible for the truth of its statements.” Id.; see also United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077, 1084 (2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cochran v. State
See also United States v. Saint Prix , 672 F.2d 1077 , 1084 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); McNeary v. Stone , 482 F.2d 804 , 806 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1071 , 94 S.Ct. 584 , 38 L.Ed.2d 478 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rhea Lucky Nichols and Michael Ford, A/K/A L.D. Haufer
(2×)
See also United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 449-50 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 , --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 2967 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982); United States v. Ocanas, 628 F.2d 353, 359-60 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 984 , 101 S.Ct. 2316 , 68 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Muench, Michelle Lewis and Albert Foreman
See, e.g., United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077, 1083 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Solmes, 527 F.2d 1370, 1372-73 (9th Cir. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hodakievic
v.
Marado
v.
Marado
No. 81-1977.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1982.
456 U.S. 992
1982 U.S. LEXIS 2262
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.