green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n
See National Savings and Trust Co. v. Park Corp., 722 F.2d 1303, 1306 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 939 , 104 S.Ct. 1916 , 80 L.Ed.2d 464 (1984); Demos, 376 A.2d at 1356-57 .
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company Of New York v. American Savings And Loan Association
See National Savings and Trust Co. v. Park Corp., 722 F.2d 1303, 1306 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 939 , 104 S.Ct. 1916 , 80 L.Ed.2d 464 (1984); Demos, 376 A.2d at 1356-57 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hanna v. First National Bank
Trust Co. v American Sav. & Loan Assn. (804 F2d 1487, 1494-1500, cert *122 denied, 482 US 929 [payor bank entitled to restitution where holder of note presented it for payment notwithstanding its knowledge of maker’s bankruptcy]); see also, National Sav. & Trust Co. v Park Corp. (722 F2d 1303, cert denied 466 US 939 [payor bank entitled to restitution when checks mistakenly paid on account having insufficient funds]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pipkin v. United States Postal Service
See Kubrick, 444 U.S. at 117-18 , 100 S.Ct. at 356-57 ; see also Anderberg v. United States, 718 F.2d 976, 977 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 939 , 104 S.Ct. 1916 , 80 L.Ed.2d 463 (1984); cf. Lampf, 111 S.Ct. at 2782 (statute of limitations for 10(b) claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 not subject to equitable tolling because the doctrine is “fundamentally inconsistent” with the time limitations imposed by the Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pipkin v. United States Postal Service
See Kubrick, 444 U.S. at 117-18 , 100 S.Ct. at 356-57 ; see also Anderberg v. United States, 718 F.2d 976, 977 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 939 , 104 S.Ct. 1916 , 80 L.Ed.2d 463 (1984); cf. Lampf, 111 S.Ct. at 2782 (statute of limitations for 10(b) claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 not subject to equitable tolling because the doctrine is "fundamentally inconsistent" with the time limitations imposed by the Act). 14 We hold that the Oklahoma saving provision is not applicable to the FTCA limitations period.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McGruder v. State
See, e.g., Anderberg v. United States, 718 F.2d 976, 977 (10th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 939 , 104 S.Ct. 1916 , 80 L.Ed.2d 463 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Austin Vernell, Acting for and on Behalf of the Community Estate and Helen Vernell, Individually v. United States Postal Service
The limitations period in section 2401(b) cannot be extended for equitable considerations. *112 Childers v. United States, 442 F.2d 1299, 1303 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 857 , 92 S.Ct. 104 , 30 L.Ed.2d 99 (1971); see also Anderberg v. United States, 718 F.2d 976, 977 (10th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 939 , 104 S.Ct. 1916 , 80 L.Ed.2d 463 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ferreira
v.
L&M Professional Consultants, Inc.
v.
L&M Professional Consultants, Inc.
No. 83-1458.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1984.
466 U.S. 939
1984 U.S. LEXIS 1833
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certio-rari denied.