green
Positive treatment
Issue: per se ruleNC ↗
Issue: Harbison errorNC ↗
Issue: promised instructionNC ↗
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Forbes v. Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers
But see Thomas S. v. Morrow, 781 F.2d 367, 377-78 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986) (guardian does act under color of state law).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Yisrael
See State v. Harbison , 315 N.C. 175 , 337 S.E.2d 504 (1985), cert. denied , *187 476 U.S. 1123 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 90 L.Ed.2d 672 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Swift
See Bennett v. Parker, 898 F.2d 1530 , 1535 n. 2 (11th Cir.1990) (Tjoflat, J., concurring) ( citing Quiller v. Barclays American/Credit, Inc., 727 F.2d 1067, 1069 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 1993, 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986)); see also Reeves v. City of Jackson, 532 F.2d 491, 494-95 (5th Cir.1976). [6] On the defining limits of this absolute immunity doctrine, the Supreme Court has provided the following example: if a probate judge, with jurisdiction over only wills and estates, should try a criminal case, he would be acting in the clear absence of jurisdiction an…
discussed
Cited "see"
Walton v. Watts (In re Swift)
See Bennett v. Parker, 898 F.2d 1530 , 1535 n. 2 (11th Cir.1990) (Tjoflat, J., concurring) (citing Quiller v. Barclays American/Credit, Inc., 727 F.2d 1067, 1069 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 1993, 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986)); see also Reeves v. City of Jackson, 532 F.2d 491, 494-95 (5th Cir.1976). .On the defining limits of this absolute immunity doctrine, the Supreme Court has provided the following example: if a probate judge, with jurisdiction over only wills and estates, should try a criminal case, he would be acting in the clear absence of jurisdiction and wo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Taffet v. Southern Co.
See Quiller v. Barclays American/Credit, Inc., 727 F.2d 1067, 1069 (11th Cir.1984) (stating that the decision to dismiss on Rule 12(b)(6) must be made on the basis of the allegations made on the face of the complaint), aff'd, 764 F.2d 1400 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
M.R. Taffet and Robert M. Fierman, on Behalf of Themselves and All of the Persons, Corporations, Municipalities, and Other Entities, Other Than the Who Are Similarly Situated v. The Southern Co., Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company and Arthur Andersen & Co., Frederick Rodgers Carr, Carr Sales Company, O.E.M. Products, Inc., Timothy Dunn Stokely, Clark Stokely, III and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Southern Company, Southern Company Services, Inc., Georgia Power Company, and Arthur Andersen & Co.
See Quiller v. Barclays American/Credit, Inc., 727 F.2d 1067, 1069 (11th Cir.1984) (stating that the decision to dismiss on Rule 12(b)(6) must be made on the basis of the allegations made on the face of the complaint), aff'd, 764 F.2d 1400 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
William C. Bennett, AKA John A. Richardson v. Garrison A. Parker, Warden, Robert M. Jackson, Officer, Daniel W. Cooper, Officer
See Quiller v. Barclays American/Credit, Inc., 727 F.2d 1067, 1069 (11th Cir.1984) ("[A] complaint may be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) when its own allegations reveal the existence of an affirmative defense, so long as the defense clearly appears on the face of the complaint”), cer t. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 1993, 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986); Green v. Maraio, 722 F.2d 1013, 1019 (2d Cir.1983) (affirmative defense of qualified immunity may be asserted in Rule 12(b)(6) motion when “complaint itself establishes ... qualified immunity”); see also 5 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burris v. First Financial Corp.
See Quiller v. Barclays American/Credit, Inc., 727 F.2d 1067 (11th Cir.1984), rehearing en banc granted, 727 F.2d 1072 (1984), restated en banc, 764 F.2d 1400 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 1993, 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986); Grant v. General Electric Credit Corp., 764 F.2d 1404 (11th Cir.1985) en banc, cert. denied 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1993 , 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986); Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc., 799 F.2d 1445 (11th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Artis
See State v. Harbison, 315 N.C. 175 , 337 S.E.2d 504 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1123 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 90 L.Ed.2d 672 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Diane Dimella v. Gray Lines of Boston, Inc., and Herb Edmunds, United States of America
See Quiller v. Barclays American/Credit, Inc., 727 F.2d 1067, 1069 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 90 L.Ed.2d 673 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mazzan v. State
See also Griffin v. Wainwright, 760 F.2d 1505, 1514 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1123 , 106 S.Ct. 1992 , 90 L.Ed.2d 672 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kirk, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Human Resources
v.
Thomas S., by his Appointed Guardian ad Litem, Brooks
v.
Thomas S., by his Appointed Guardian ad Litem, Brooks
No. 85-1590.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1986.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.