Griffith v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 1157 (1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Griffith v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 1157 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tinsley v. State (alacrimapp, 1987-05-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Tinsley v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Griffith v. Kentucky , --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2274 , 90 L.Ed.2d 717 (1986) and Brown v. United States , --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2275 , 90 L.Ed.2d 718 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Cox
usnmcmilrev · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Griffith v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2274 , 90 L.Ed.2d 717 (cert. granted 1986) and Brown v. United States, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2275 , 90 L.Ed.2d 718 (cert. granted 1986); compare Allen v. Hardy, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2878 , 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986) (per curiam) (Batson not retroactive on collateral attack). .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lowden David
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Griffith v. Kentucky, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2274 , 90 L.Ed.2d 717 (cert. granted June 2, 1986) and Brown v. United States, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2275 , 90 L.Ed.2d 718 (cert. granted June 2, 1986).
cited Cited "see" Diaz v. Scully
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Griffith v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2274 , 90 L.Ed.2d 717 (1986), and Brown v. U.S., — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2275 , 90 L.Ed.2d 718 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griffith
v.
Kentucky
No. 85-5221.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1986.
476 U.S. 1157
1986 U.S. LEXIS 1520
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

Sup. Ct. Ky. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari is granted limited to the following question: “In cases pending on direct appeal, should the holding in Batson v. Kentucky, ante, p. 79, be given retroactive effect?” Case is set for oral argument in tandem with No. 85-5731, Brown v. United States, immediately infra.