Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Eugene G. Adams v. Richard L. Dugger, Superintendent, Florida Dept. Of Corrections
Adams relies upon Marrero v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1468 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 108 S.Ct. 1235 , 1247, 99 L.Ed.2d 434, 445 (1988), which contrasted Solem v. Helm with Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 , 100 S.Ct. 1133 , 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980), and held that, under the facts of that case, the sentence had to be examined under the criteria established by Solem v. Helm.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward J. Elkins
See Marrero v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1468 , 1473 n. 7 (11th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1235 , 1247, 99 L.Ed.2d 434 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Willie James Williams v. Willie E. Johnson, Warden
See Marrero v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1468, 1472 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 108 S.Ct. 1235 , 1247, 99 L.Ed.2d 434, 445 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles H. Grier and Isaac Harper
In order to demonstrate possession of cocaine, it is sufficient that the government show a level of control that meets the standard of “constructive possession,” As we explained in United States v. Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706, 756 (7th Cir.1988): “The rule of constructive possession holds that ‘a person can be convicted for possessing cocaine though he does not possess it in a literal sense.’ United States v. Manzella, 791 F.2d 1263, 1266 (7th Cir.1986). ‘To establish constructive possession of a controlled substance, the government must produce evidence demonstrating “ownership, do…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hunter
v.
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
v.
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
No. 87-6139.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1988.
485 U.S. 965
1988 U.S. LEXIS 1353
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Missouri (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.