G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2008 ·
…the statute 14 itself specifies the only relevant time the application must be 15 made: 'before return of an indictment.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen William BISCHEL, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
the statute itself specifies the only relevant time the application must be made: 'before return of an indictment.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Kozeny (Bourke)
Because indictment ordinarily 8 precedes the expiration of the statute of limitations period, 9 then, the words "before return of an indictment" actually imply a 10 time frame before the statute of limitations has run. 11 The government's reliance on United States v. Miller, 12 830 F.2d 1073 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1033 13 (1988), is misplaced.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Kozeny (Bourke)
Because indictment ordinarily 8 precedes the expiration of the statute of limitations period, 9 then, the words "before return of an indictment" actually imply a 10 time frame before the statute of limitations has run. 11 The government's reliance on United States v. Miller, 12 830 F.2d 1073 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1033 13 (1988), is misplaced.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miller
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-1040.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 2, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.