green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases ·
“Mattox II”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Richardson v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
Ct. 307, 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990) (state laws proscribing deceptive advertising are preempted by federal statute in the Deregulation Act when a state attempts to enforce such laws against the advertising of fares by interstate and international airlines), the Fifth Circuit held that the key in determining whether removal is appropriate under the complete preemption doctrine is the “intent of Congress” and not whether Congress provided a substitute federal remedy for the preempted state remedy.
discussed
Cited "see"
Deboer v. Mellon Mortgage Company
See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Mattox, 897 F.2d 773, 787 (5th Cir.) (jurisdictional objection waived when arguments go "to the heart of the issue before the district court"), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 926 , 111 S.Ct. 307 , 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990). 15 The Crehans also challenge the sufficiency of the notice of the proposed settlement.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeBoer v. Mellon Mortgage Co.
See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Mattox, 897 F.2d 773, 787 (5th Cir.) (jurisdictional objection waived when arguments go “to the heart of the issue before the district court”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 926 , 111 S.Ct. 307 , 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manchester Knitted Fashions, Inc. v. Amalgamated Cotton Garment And Allied Industries Fund
See also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Mattox, 897 F.2d 773, 786 (5th Cir.) (held that where parties who were not named in the complaint nor served with a copy thereof, objected to the filing of a TRO by plaintiff, they had submitted to the jurisdiction of the district court and waived their Rule 12(b) objections challenging personal jurisdiction), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 307 , 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990); Marcial Ucin, S.A., 723 F.2d 994 (1st Cir.1983) (where third party defendant did not file Rule 12 motion to dismiss nor a responsive pleading, he nonetheless submitted himself to t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manchester Knitted Fashions, Inc. v. Amalgamated Cotton Garment & Allied Industries Fund
See also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Mattox, 897 F.2d 773, 786 (5th Cir.) (held that where parties who were not named in the complaint nor served with a copy thereof, objected to the filing of a TRO by plaintiff, they had submitted to the jurisdiction of the district court and waived their Rule 12(b) objections challenging personal jurisdiction), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 307 , 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990); Marcial Ucin, S.A., 723 F.2d 994 (1st Cir.1983) (where third party defendant did not file Rule 12 motion to dismiss nor a responsive pleading, he nonetheless submitted himself to the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Centrifugal Casting Machine Co. v. American Bank & Trust Co.
First, “[t]he simple result [of a letter of credit] is that the issuer substitutes its credit, preferred by the beneficiary, for that of the account party.” Id,.; see also Republic Nat’l Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 894 F.2d 1255, 1258 (11th Cir.) (letter gives beneficiary irrevocable right to payment, not from account party, who might become insolvent or refuse to pay, but from bank), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 308 , 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990); Airline Reporting Corp. v. First Nat’l Bank, 832 F.2d 823, 826 (4th Cir.1987) (issuer replaces customer’s promise to pay with its own …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Centrifugal Casting Machine Co., Inc. v. American Bank & Trust Co.
First, "[t]he simple result [of a letter of credit] is that the issuer substitutes its credit, preferred by the beneficiary, for that of the account party." Id.; see also Republic Nat'l Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 894 F.2d 1255, 1258 (11th Cir.) (letter gives beneficiary irrevocable right to payment, not from account party, who might become insolvent or refuse to pay, but from bank), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 308 , 112 L.Ed.2d 261 (1990); Airline Reporting Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 832 F.2d 823, 826 (4th Cir.1987) (issuer replaces customer's promise to pay with its own promis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
v.
Kanakis et ux.
v.
Kanakis et ux.
No. 90-327.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1990.
498 U.S. 926
1990 U.S. LEXIS 5287
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Motion of American Council of Life Insurance et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.