McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 498 U.S. 992 (1990). · Go Syfert
McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 498 U.S. 992 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
136 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Cited for
the scope of fraud under these [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is requiredno pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • United States v. Boots, 80 F.3d 580 (1st Cir. 1996).published 3 cites
    (the scope of fraud under these [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required)
  • United States v. Lazore, No. 94-1811 (1st Cir. Mar. 29, 1996).published
    (the scope of fraud under these ______ [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and . . . no misrepresentation of fact is required)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“the scope of fraud under these federal fraud statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • United States v. Boots, 80 F.3d 580 (1st Cir. 1996).published 3 cites
    “the scope of fraud under these federal fraud statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required”
  • United States v. Lazore, No. 94-1811 (1st Cir. Mar. 29, 1996).published
    “the scope of fraud under these ______ federal fraud statutes is broader than common law fraud, and . . . no misrepresentation of fact is required”
Other citing cases19 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Show 9 more citing cases
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc.
v.
Heritage Travel, Inc.
No. 90-551.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1990.
Published opinion
498 U.S. 992
1990 U.S. LEXIS 6072
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 65 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.