green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.8 score
“in attempting to predict future ability to pay, district courts must be realistic and must avoid imposing a fine when the possibility of a future ability to pay is based merely on chance.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gov't V.I. v. Davis
in attempting to predict future ability to pay, district courts must be realistic and must avoid imposing a fine when the possibility of a future ability to pay is based merely on chance.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS v. ASTARTE DAVIS, Appellant; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICE, ASTARTE Astarte Davis, Appellant
in attempting to predict future ability to pay, district courts must be realistic and must avoid imposing a fine when the possibility of a future ability to pay is based merely on chance.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Craig R. Franke
Id. at 985. 58 With these standards in mind, we find no clearly erroneous findings of fact and no abuse of discretion.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peoples
See United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 986 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jan Manzer, Doing Business as V.C. Hacker, Also Known as Don Davis
(2×)
See United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 985 (10th Cir.) (restitution order may be upheld solely on defendant’s earning potential), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Catucci
See United States v. Passos-Paternina, 918 F.2d 979, 985 (1st Cir. 1990) (jury may construe knowingly false statement as evidence of consciousness of guilt), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , and cert. guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Giacomo D. Catucci
See United States v. Passos-Paternina, 918 F.2d 979, 985 (1st Cir.1990) (jury may construe knowingly false statement as evidence of consciousness of guilt), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 and cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1210 , 111 S.Ct. 2809 , 115 L.Ed.2d 981 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Catucci
See United ___ ______ States v. Passos-Paternina, 918 F.2d 979, 985 (1st Cir. 1990) ______ ________________ (jury may construe knowingly false statement as evidence of consciousness of guilt), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , and cert. _____ ______ _____ ____________________ guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Willie Lloyd Turner v. David A. Williams, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center
(2×)
See Bassette v. Thompson, 915 F.2d 932, 936-37 (4th Cir.1990) (ineffective assistance claims not raised on state habeas are procedurally defaulted) (citing Teague, 489 U.S. 297 -99, 109 S.Ct. at 1068-69 ), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1639 , 113 L.Ed.2d 734 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Howard Gilbreath
(2×)
See United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 985 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jo Lynn Patty
See United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 986 (10th Cir.) (must be within realm of possibility for defendant to pay restitution within time limit), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Winkler
See United States v. Wise, 990 F.2d 1545, 1547-48 (10th Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 985 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991)); United States v. Sunrhodes, 831 F.2d 1537, 1546 (10th Cir.1987); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3664 (a) (defendant's financial resources are one of several factors to be considered).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael F. Logar
See United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 985-86 (10th Cir.) (noting that defendants had great income earning potential), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel v. Lane
Compare United States v. Hill, 798 F.2d 402, 406-7 (10th Cir.1986) (requiring specific findings) with United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 986 (10th Cir.) (not requiring specific findings), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles E. Molen, A/K/A Charles E. Egbire-Molen, A/K/A Charles Eromosele Molen, United States of America v. Harrison Molen
(2×)
Compare United States v. Hill, 798 F.2d 402, 406-07 (10th Cir.1986) (requiring specific findings) with United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 986 (10th Cir.) (not requiring specific findings), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul J. Savoie
Compare United States v. Hill, 798 F.2d 402, 406-07 (10th Cir.1986) (requiring specific findings) with United States v. Morrison, 938 F.2d 168, 171-72 (10th Cir.1991) (not requiring specific findings) and United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 986 (10th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Savoie
Compare United States v. Hill, 798 F.2d 402, 406-07 (10th Cir. 1986) (requiring specific findings) with United States v. Morrison, 938 F.2d 168, 171-72 (10th Cir. 1991) (not requiring specific findings) and United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983 F.2d 983, 986 (10th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 1637 (1991). 11 court gave thought to the requisite factors.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Savoie
Compare United States v. Hill, 798 F.2d 402, 406-07 (10th Cir. _______ _____________ ____ 1986) (requiring specific findings) with United States v. ____ ______________ Morrison, 938 F.2d 168, 171-72 (10th Cir. 1991) (not requiring ________ specific findings) and United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983 F.2d ___ _____________ _____ 983, 986 (10th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 1637 _____ ______ (1991). 11 court gave thought to the requisite factors.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James L. Diamond
United States v. Teehee, 893 F.2d 271, 273-74 (10th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983, 985 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991); 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e) (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kim A. Wise
(2×)
See also, United States v. Rogat, 924 F.2d 983 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1637 , 113 L.Ed.2d 732 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rogat et ux.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-7482.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1991.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.