green
Positive treatment
published
1.3 score
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“Even assuming that [the employee's] right to petition was implicated, the Pickering/Connick balancing test is equally applicable in deciding whether the state's interest as an employer outweighs the [F]irst [A]mendment interest of the employee.”
- Shahar v. Bowers, 70 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 1995).published“Even assuming that [the employee's] right to petition was implicated, the Pickering/Connick balancing test is equally applicable in deciding whether the state's interest as an employer outweighs the [F]irst [A]mendment…”
- Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael J. Bowers, Individually & in His Off. Capacity as Attorney Gen. of the State of Georgia, 114 F.3d 1097 (11th Cir. 1997).published“Even assuming that [the employee's] right to petition was implicated, the Pickering/Connick balancing test is equally applicable in deciding whether the state's interest as an employer outweighs the [F]irst [A]mendment…”
Other citing cases
- Deltona Corp. v. Est. of Bobinger, 582 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herrick
v.
Florida Bar
v.
Florida Bar
No. 90-1539.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1991.
Published opinion
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Fla. Cer-tiorari denied.