green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.4 score
“case and controversy' issues require analysis of the parties' respective positions regarding the conduct in question.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fusco v. Rome Cable Corp.
case and controversy' issues require analysis of the parties' respective positions regarding the conduct in question.
discussed
Cited "see"
Metro A, LLC, Sun Holdings, LLC, POP Restaurants, LLC, Golden Restaurants, Inc., Firebrand Properties, LP, Corral Group, LP, Kansas Corral, LLC, Sunny Corral Management, LLC, Guillermo Perales, Frys Management, LLC v. Jessica Polley
See HBA East, Ltd. v. JEA Boxing Co., Inc., 796 S.W.2d 534 , 538–39 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, writ denied), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 (1991) (holding defendants waived challenge, including due process complaint, to lack of notice of default judgment hearing by failing to urge the issue in a motion for new trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metro A, LLC, Sun Holdings, LLC, POP Restaurants, LLC, Golden Restaurants, Inc., Firebrand Properties, LP, Corral Group, LP, Kansas Corral, LLC, Sunny Corral Management, LLC, Guillermo Perales, Frys Management, LLC v. Jessica Polley
See HBA East, Ltd. v. JEA Boxing Co., Inc. , 796 S.W.2d 534 , 538–39 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, writ denied), cert. denied , 501 U.S. 1218 (1991) (holding defendants waived challenge, including due process complaint, to lack of notice of default judgment hearing by failing to urge the issue in a motion for new trial).
cited
Cited "see"
Sciotto Ex Rel. Sciotto v. Marple Newtown School District
See Brown v. Gra-bowski 922 F.2d 1097, 1118 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosales v. Coughlin
See Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Maxus Energy Corp., 925 F.2d 556, 562 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2829 , 115 L.Ed.2d 998 (1991); Datskow v. Teledyne, Inc., 899 F.2d 1298, 1302 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 149 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karagounis v. Property Co. of America
See HBA East, Ltd. v. JEA Boxing Co., 796 S.W.2d 534, 538-39 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, writ denied), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2828 , 115 L.Ed.2d 998 (1991) (holding that the appellant waived his claim that he was denied prior notice of the hearing on a motion for default judgment because the issue was not first presented to the trial court).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaRou v. Ridlon
See Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169, 1179 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2828 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991) 6 (“Most cases *663 involving a retaliation claim are based on an employment action which has an adverse impact on the employee, i.e., discharge, demotion, or failure to promote.”); see also Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62, 75 , 110 S.Ct. 2729, 2737 , 111 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990); Welsh v. Derwinski, 14 F.3d 85, 86 (1st Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaRou v. Ridlon
See Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169 , ___ _______ _______________ 1179 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 (1991)6 ("Most cases ____ ______ involving a retaliation claim are based on an employment action ____________________ 6Although Connell involved ADEA claims rather than 1983, _______ its analysis is persuasive.
cited
Cited "see"
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. St. Joe Minerals Corp.
See Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Maxus Energy Corp., 925 F.2d 556, 562 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2829 , 115 L.Ed.2d 998 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London v. St. Joe Minerals Corporation
See Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Maxus Energy Corp., 925 F.2d 556, 562 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2829 , 115 L.Ed.2d 998 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo
See Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. Maxus Energy Corp., 925 F.2d 556, 565 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2829 , 115 L.Ed.2d 998 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gina Lowe v. Sporicidin International
See Dennison v. County of Frederick, 921 F.2d 50, 53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2828 , 115 L.Ed.2d 998 (1990); see also Weiser v. United States, 959 F.2d 146, 147 (9th Cir.1992); Lussier v. Louisville Ladder Co., 938 F.2d 299 , 301 n. 2 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Kentucky
See Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097 , 1106 n. 3 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991); Drake v. Scott, 812 F.2d 395, 399 (8th Cir.), adhered to, 823 F.2d 239 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 965 , 108 S.Ct. 455 , 98 L.Ed.2d 395 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Commonwealth Of Kentucky
See Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097 , 1106 n. 3 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991); Drake v. Scott, 812 F.2d 395, 399 (8th Cir.), adhered to, 823 F.2d 239 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 965 , 108 S.Ct. 455 , 98 L.Ed.2d 395 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Ringer v. Fallis
See Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1113 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Lattany v. Four Unknown U.S. Marshals
See Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1110 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dollinger v. State Insurance Fund
Further, plaintiffs allegations that he was denied provisional or permanent promotions satisfy the second element of a retaliation claim — “‘that he suffered a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment.’ ” Pomilio, 1999 WL 9843 , at *8 (quoting Torres v. Pisano, 116 F.3d 625, 640 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 563 , 139 L.Ed.2d 404 (1997)); see also Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169, 1179 (1st Cir.) (“Most cases involving a retaliation claim are based on an employment action which has an adverse impact on the employee, i.e., discharge…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramirez v. United States
The Third Circuit has found that “while supervising public officials may not in any way authorize, encourage, or approve constitutional torts, they have no affirmative duty to train, supervise or discipline so as to prevent such conduct.” Chinchello v. Fenton, 805 F.2d 126, 133 (3d Cir.1986) (dismissing Bivens claim against the Director of Bureau of Prisons alleging that his failure to train, supervise, and discipline his .subordinates resulted in plaintiffs injuries); see also Brown v. Grabowski 922 F.2d 1097, 1119-20 , (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ollie LATTIMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
Hicks, 509 U.S. at 511 , 113 S.Ct. at 2749 ; Smith, 40 F.3d at 16 ; Woods, 30 F.3d at 261 n. 3; see also Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2828 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lattimore v. Polaroid Corp.
Hicks, 509 U.S. at 511 , _____ -17- 113 S. Ct. at 2749 ; Smith, 40 F.3d at 16; Woods, 30 F.3d at 261 _____ _____ n.3; see also Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169 (1st ________ _______ _______________ Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S. Ct. 2828 (1991). _____ ______ Polaroid argues that it is entitled to judgment with respect to both the Chapter 151B and Title VII discrimination claims because Lattimore's evidence was insufficient to establish either a prima facie case or that Polaroid's proffered reason was _____ _____ pretextual.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lattimore v. Polaroid Corp.
Hicks, 509 U.S. at 511 , -17- 113 S. Ct. at 2749 ; Smith, 40 F.3d at 16 ; Woods, 30 F.3d at 261 n.3; see also Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S. Ct. 2828 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LTV Corp. v. Back (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)
See, e.g., Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc. v. Maxus Energy Corp., 925 F.2d 556 , 562 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2829 , 115 L.Ed.2d 998 (1991); YWCA v. HMC Entertainment, Inc., 1992 WL 279361 , at *2, *3 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kneipp v. Tedder
Mark, 51 F.3d at 1152 (citing D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School, 972 F.2d 1364 , 1373 (3d Cir.1992) (in banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993)); see also Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1114-16 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kneipp v. Tedder
Mark, 51 F.3d at 1152 (citing D.R. by L.R. v. Middle Bucks Area Vocational Technical School, 972 F.2d 1364 , 1373 (3d Cir.1992) (in banc), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1079 , 113 S.Ct. 1045 , 122 L.Ed.2d 354 (1993)); see also Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1114-16 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brendhan B. Harris v. The City of Virginia Beach, and G.M. Van Auken, Iii, Lieutenant M.E. Beane, Captain W.W. Baker D.G. McCloud Major Charles R. Wall, Individually and as Officer of the Department of Police, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia Fagan D. Stackhouse, Individually and as the Director of the Department of Human Resources, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia James K. Spore, Individually and in His Official Capacity as City Manager of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, Brendhan B. Harris v. The City of Virginia Beach G.M. Van Auken, Iii, Lieutenant M.E. Beane, Captain W.W. Baker D.G. McCloud Major Charles R. Wall, Individually and as Officer of the Department of Police, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia Fagan D. Stackhouse, Individually and as the Director of the Department of Human Resources, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia James K. Spore, Individually and in His Official Capacity as City Manager of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
See, e.g., Dennison v. County of Frederick, 921 F.2d 50, 54 (4th Cir.1990) ("Although [plaintiff's] allegations appear to be of public interest, when they are considered in the context of what actually occurred ... they are 'more properly viewed as essentially a "private" matter between employer and employee.' " (quoting Berger v. Battaglia, 779 F.2d 992, 999 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 (1986))), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alexis v. McDonald's Restaurants of Massachusetts, Inc.
(2×)
See Fed.R.Evid. 701(a); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a); Willco Kuwait (Trading) S.A.K v. deSavary, 843 F.2d 618, 624 (1st Cir.1988) (lay opinion testimony, which does little more than tell the jury what result to reach, should not be admitted); see also Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169, 1177-78 (1st Cir.) (lay opinion—that employer was “ ‘determined to eliminate ... senior employees’ ” — pointed to no specific facts sufficient to buttress such a “broad assertion”) (ADEA claim), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2828 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991); cf. Gross v. Burggraf Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alexis v. McDonald's Corp.
P. 56(a); ___ Willco Kuwait (Trading) S.A.K. v. deSavary, 843 F.2d 618 , 624 _______________________________ ________ (1st Cir. 1988) (lay opinion testimony, which does little more 10 than tell the jury what result to reach, should not be admitted); see also Connell v. Bank of Boston, 924 F.2d 1169, 1177-78 (1st ___ ____ _______ ______________ Cir.) (lay opinion that employer was "`determined to eliminate . . . senior employees'" pointed to no specific facts suffi- cient to buttress such a "broad assertion") (ADEA claim), cert. _____ denied, 501 U.S. 1218 (1991); cf. Gross v. Burggraf Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Melo v. Hafer, 13 F.3d 736, 745 (3d Cir.1994) ("If, after the summary judgment practice prescribed by that rule, the undisputed facts of record demonstrated entitlement to immunity, the Court would ignore the bare allegations of the complaint and grant summary judgment on grounds of immunity."); see also Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1110-11 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: City Phila Litigation
Melo v. Hafer, 13 F.3d 736, 745 (3d Cir. 1994) ("If, after the summary judgment practice prescribed by that rule, the undisputed facts of record demonstrated entitlement to immunity, the Court would ignore the bare allegations of the complaint and grant summary judgment on grounds of immunity."); see also Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1110-11 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Africa v. City of Philadelphia
Melo v. Hafer, 13 F.3d 736, 745 (3d Cir.1994) (“If, after the summary judgment practice prescribed by that rule, the undisputed facts of record demonstrated entitlement to immunity, the Court would ignore the bare allegations of the complaint and grant summary judgment on grounds of immunity.”); see also Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1110-11 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Acierno v. Cloutier
Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 524-30 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2814-17 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985); see also Kulwicki v. Dawson, 969 F.2d 1454, 1459-61 (3d Cir.1992). 32 In adhering to this theory of appellate jurisdiction, we have recognized that an order denying a defense of immunity is reviewable before trial because entitlement to "immunity from federal claims encompasses not only immunity from liability, but also immunity from suit." Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1105 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1218 , 111 S.Ct. 2827 , 115 L.Ed.2d 997 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HBA East Ltd.
v.
JEA Boxing Co.
v.
JEA Boxing Co.
No. 90-1658.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. New York (1)
Ct. App. Tex., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.