green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gay v. Shannon
See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 350-51 , 116 S.Ct. 2174 , 135 *116 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996) (requiring an actual injury to establish a violation of the right of access to the courts).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: TMI
See Osei-Afriyie v. Medical College of Pennsylvania, 937 F.2d 876, 884 (3d Cir.) (citing cases), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 979 , 112 S.Ct. 581 , 116 L.Ed.2d 606 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Tmi, Dorothy L. Aldrich Faith Alleman Philip Angeli Michael J. Anoka Ruth v. Anoka Catherine J. Balinosky Regis E. Beasley Louis Borda Betty Marie Boylestein George L. Boylestein Shirlean Burhanan Ruth E. Butler Frank J. Caka Susan H. Chynoweth Daniel M. Chynoweth Catherine Costello John T. Costello Martha A. Costik Richard N. Costik Mary Margaret Earhart Edward Ferguson Marco G. Glad, Jr. Linda I. Glad Barbara Grandon Helen M. Hank Edward John Hertzog Marie H. Hertzog Dianne Hindermyer George Vance Hitz Marjorie B. Hitz Carol C. Hoch Louis A. Hoch Estate of Robert P. Holmes Thelma M. Nagy Barry Obercash Georgeann Pristello James J. Pristello Jamie Lynn Pristello Kenneth R. Snyder Patricia Southard Joseph Stewart Charlotte Evelyn Stewart
See Osei-Afriyie v. Medical College of Pennsylvania, 937 F.2d 876, 884 (3d Cir.) (citing cases), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 979 , 112 S.Ct. 581 , 116 L.Ed.2d 606 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
De Caceres
v.
Scholl
v.
Scholl
No. 91-5947.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1991.
Blackmun, Stevens.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Lead Opinion
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 23, 1991, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Dissent
Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens,
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.