green
Positive treatment
Issue: provision ruleOH ↗
Issue: knowing and voluntary waiverNV ↗
Issue: sua sponte instructionDC ↗
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Stewart
But see United States v. Pryce, 938 F.2d 1343, 1346 (D.C.Cir. 1991) (concluding that witness’s “Hallucinations in September are obviously relevant to a witness's ability to discern reality in December”), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Matter of Brooks, 07-Ca-74 (1-14-2008)
See State v. Frazier (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 247 , 251 , 574 N.E.2d 483 , 487 , certiorari denied (1992), 503 U .S. 941, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hudgins, 2006ca00093 (6-25-2007)
See State v. Frazier (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 247 , 251 , 574 N.E.2d 483 , 487 , certiorari denied (1992), 503 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rusnak, Unpublished Decision (5-2-2002)
See, State v. Frazier (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 247 , 251 , 574 N.E.2d 483 , 487 , certiorari denied (1992), 503 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dishman
See United States v. Dunson, 940 F.2d 989, 995 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Goldson
See State v. Frazier (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 247 , 574 N.E.2d 483 , certiorari denied (1992), 503 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Lamont Sherrod
See United States v. Dunson, 940 F.2d 989, 995 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Roberto Fausto-Rendon, AKA Francisco R. Fausto-Rendon
See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Said
(2×)
See State v. Frazier (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 247, 251 , 574 N.E.2d 483, 487 , certiorari denied, U.S. , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Hillman and Andrew Jackson
See United States v. Dunson, 940 F.2d 989, 995 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992); French, 974 F.2d at 693 (6th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fulvio Desantiago-Martinez
(2×)
See United States v. Wessells, 936 F.2d 165, 167 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992); United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 320 (9th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Manuel Garcia (93-1002) Arturo Garcia (93-1056) and Howard Eugene McCully Jr. (93-1054)
(2×)
See United States v. Dunson, 940 F.2d 989, 995 (6th Cir.1991) (20-year sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute seven kilograms of cocaine was not unconstitutionally disproportionate), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992) 13 Second, McCully argues that the case should be remanded because he asked for a departure downward from the sentencing guidelines but "from the Court's response it is unclear that the Court believed it had the authority to do so." However, the sentencing transcript shows that when McCully's lawyer argued for a departure downw…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billie Jo Gustafson
See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 320-22 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992) 2 Because we vacate and remand, we need not address Gustafson's claim that she was denied due process at the sentencing hearing as a result of the district court's denial of her motion for expert services
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Lagarda-Lagarda
See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 319 (9th Cir.1990) ("[I]f the waiver [of a right to appeal pursuant to plea agreement] is made voluntarily and knowingly, it is enforceable and does not violate due process or public policy."), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992). 6 On appeal, defendant argues that the waiver was not made knowingly.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Murphy
See United States v. Navarro-Botella, 912 F.2d 318, 321 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992) (it is not a due process violation for a defendant to waive a nonconstitutional right, such as a statutory right to appeal); Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651 , 97 S.Ct. 2034 , 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977) (there is no constitutional right to appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Petition of Manula
See, for example, United States v. DeSantiagoMartinez (9th Cir. 1992), 980 F.2d 582 , citing United States v. Bolinger (9th Cir. 1991), 940 F.2d 478, 480 , and United States v. NavarroBotello (9th Cir. 1990), 912 F.2d 318, 319, 321-22 , cert. denied,_ U.S._, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992); United States v. Wiggins (4th Cir. 1990), 905 F.2d 51 ; Barnes v. Lynaugh (5th Cir, 1987), 817 F.2d 336 ; Johnson v. United States (7th Cir. 1988), 838 F.2d 201 ; People v. Nichols (1986), 143 Ill.App.3d 673 , 97 Ill.Dec. 870 , 493 N.E.2d 677 ; State v. Perkins (1987), 108 Wash.2d 212 , 737 P.2d 250…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chet Singh Sidhu
See United States v. Torres, No. 92-50549, 1993 WL 267487, at * 1 (9th Cir. July 21, 1993) (citing United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992). 4 Accordingly, Sidhu's appeal is dismissed. 5 DISMISSED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Pryce, 291 U.S.App.D.C. 84 , 938 F.2d 1343 (1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 1679, 117 L.Ed.2d 629 , 118 L.Ed.2d 396 (1992); id., 291 U.S.App.D.C. at 93 , 938 F.2d at 1352 (Silberman, J., dissenting).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse Gary Soliz
See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Wayne Rowen
Id.; see United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard I. Gilmore
See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 320-322 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1488 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rome, Unpublished Decision (12-27-2001)
See also, State v. Smith 1996 Ohio App. LEXIS 214 (January 25, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No 68745, unreported. 4 Evid.R. 801(C). 5 Evid.R. 803(4). 6 State v. Dever (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 401 , 596 N.E.2d 436 . 7 (1983), 20 Ohio App.3d 172 . 8 (1997) 78 Ohio St.3d 380 . 9 (1982), 457 U.S. 31 . 10 Evid.R. 601(A). 11 State v. Wallace (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 87 , 94 , 524 N.E.2d 466 , 472 . 12 Turner v. Turner (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 337 , 343 , 617 N.E.2d 1123 , 1128 . 13 State v. Clark (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 466 , 644 N.E.2d 331 . 14 (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 247 , 574 N.E.2d 483 , syllabus, certiorari denied …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janis Darlene FLOYD, Defendant-Appellant
Cortez, 973 F.2d at 768 ; see, e.g., United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321 (9th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992); Rodriguez v. Ricketts, 798 F.2d 1250, 1254 (9th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1057 , 107 S.Ct. 937 , 93 L.Ed.2d 987 (1987); accord United States v. Bell, 966 F.2d 914, 917 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Fisher, 111 F.2d 371, 375 (7th Cir.1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel Enrique RUELAS, Defendant-Appellant
The right to appeal is not a constitutional right, but is “purely statutory.” United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel Enrique RUELAS, Defendant-Appellant
The right to appeal is not a constitutional right, but is “purely statutory.” United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Parke
See also United States v. Dunson, 940 F.2d 989, 994 (6th Cir.1991) (test for consent is would a reasonable, innocent person feel free to decline a police officer’s request or otherwise terminate the encounter), cer t. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hickey
See also United States v. Dunson, 940 F.2d 989, 995 (6th Cir.1991) (upholding the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(A)(ii) where it resulted in sentencing a defendant with only one prior drug conviction to 20 years in prison), cert. denied, — U.S. - — , 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992). 3 2. 21 U.S.C. § 860 (a).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sergio Rafael Gonzalez
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 (1992); United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir.1991). 1 These cases present a question of exceptional importance: Is the government entitled to the benefit of its bargain by obtaining the dismissal of an appeal brought in contravention of such a plea agreement, without incurring the cost and delay of briefing the case on the merits?
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Langston
United States v. Giovannetti, 928 F.2d 225, 227 (7th Cir.1991) (holding appeals court has "discretion to overlook a failure to argue harmlessness”); see also United States v. Pryce, 938 F.2d 1343, 1347 (D.C.Cir.1991) (initiating harmless error review), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 and cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 1679 , 118 L.Ed.2d 396 (1992). .We also cannot find error in the district court’s admission of a document that described the locations at which items were seized at the ’ranch.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Parker D. Langston, United States of America v. Huey Lee Francis, United States of America v. Enoch McIlroy United States of America v. William McIlroy United States of America v. James McIlroy United States of America v. Speck Aron Ross
United States v. Giovannetti, 928 F.2d 225, 227 (7th Cir.1991) (holding appeals court has "discretion to overlook a failure to argue harmlessness"); see also United States v. Pryce, 938 F.2d 1343, 1347 (D.C.Cir.1991) (initiating harmless error review), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1488 , 117 L.Ed.2d 629 and cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1679 , 118 L.Ed.2d 396 (1992) 10 We also cannot find error in the district court's admission of a document that described the locations at which items were seized at the ranch.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ogunleye
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 91-6839.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1992.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.