Benitez v. United States, 513 U.S. 1197 (1995). · Go Syfert
Benitez v. United States, 513 U.S. 1197 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Cited for
Only a 'federal arrest' triggers the running of the thirty day time period set forth in § 3161(b).no pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • United States v. Ronald McGill, 92 F.3d 1183 (4th Cir. 1996).unpublished
    (Only a 'federal arrest' triggers the running of the thirty day time period set forth in § 3161(b).)
  • United States v. McGill, No. 95-5099 (4th Cir. Aug. 2, 1996).unpublished
    (Only a `fed- eral arrest' triggers the running of the thirty day time period set forth in § 3161(b).)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“only a 'federal arrest' triggers the running of the thirty day time period set forth in 3161(b).”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • United States v. Ronald McGill, 92 F.3d 1183 (4th Cir. 1996).unpublished
    “only a 'federal arrest' triggers the running of the thirty day time period set forth in 3161(b).”
  • United States v. McGill, No. 95-5099 (4th Cir. Aug. 2, 1996).unpublished
    “only a fed- eral arrest' triggers the running of the thirty day time period set forth in 3161(b).”
Other citing cases10 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benitez
v.
United States
No. 94-7837.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1995.
Published opinion
513 U.S. 1197
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.