green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Casillas
See United States v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 676, 682 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1162 , 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996), abrogated on other grounds by Morales v. Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kathleen Kremser Jones
(2×)
See United States v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 676, 681-82 (6th Cir.) (Moore, J.), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DeLuca
See United States v. Levy-Cordero, 67 F.3d 1002, 1018 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996); United States v. Ortiz, 23 F.3d 21, 27 (1st Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darnell A. Catlett
See United States v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 676, 683 (6th Cir.) (refusing to adopt a per se prohibition on using an officer as both a fact and expert witness), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996); United States v. Foster, 939 F.2d 445, 450-52 (7th Cir.1991) (allowing dual testimony but urging care to avoid jury confusion); United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 760 (2d Cir.1984) (finding it was not improper for the Government to elicit expert testimony from officers who testified as fact witnesses), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1084 , 105 S.Ct. 1842 , 85 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boyd
See United States v. Levy-Cordero, 67 F.3d 1002, 1019 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996) (noting that “passing allusions are not adequate to preserve an argument in either a trial or an appellate venue”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Rivera-Gomez v. de Castro, 843 F.2d 631, 635 (1st Cir.1988) (noting that a “litigant has an obligation to spell out its arguments squarely and distinctly ... or else forever hold its peace”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boyd
See United States v. Levy-Cordero, 67 F.3d 1002, 1019 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996) (noting that "passing allusions are not adequate to preserve an argument in either a trial or an appellate venue") (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Rivera-Gomez v. de Castro, 843 F.2d 631, 635 (1st Cir.1988) (noting that a "litigant has an obligation to spell out its arguments squarely and distinctly ... or else forever hold its peace") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laboy-Delgado
In regard to the first two statements attacked by the appellant, we conduct our review of the trial court’s rulings de novo and will set aside the verdict only if we find that “the prosecutor’s remarks were both inappropriate and harmful.” United States v. Wihbey, 75 F.3d 761, 771 (1st Cir.1996); accord United States v. Levy-Cordero, 67 F.3d 1002, 1008 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fany Moreno
See United States v. Dozal, 173 F.3d 787, 794 (10th Cir.1999); United States v. Thame, 846 F.2d 200, 206-07 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 928 , 109 S.Ct. 314 , 102 L.Ed.2d 333 (1988); Prescott, 581 F.2d at 1350-52 ; United States v. Taxe, 540 F.2d 961, 969 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 737 , 50 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977); United States v. Turner, 39 M.J. 259, 262 (C.M.A.1994); State v. Palenkas, 188 Ariz. 201 , 933 P.2d 1269 (1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1120 , 117 S.Ct. 2513 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1997); State v. Jennings, 333 N.C. 579 , 430 S.E.2d 188, 200 (1993), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pendleton v. City of Haverhill
See, e.g., United States v. Levy-Cordero, 67 F.3d 1002, 1016 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1162 , 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996); United States v. Brandon, 17 F.3d 409, 444 (1st Cir.1994); see also Fed.R.Evid. 402.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lynell R. Ewing
(2×)
Ewing’s criminal history is replete with convictions based on stolen credit cards and checks. “[I]f a defendant has been convicted for the same offense more than once, he has demonstrated the need for greater sanctions to deter him from committing the same crime again-greater sanctions than might be required for a defendant who has never been convicted of a similar offense.” United States v. Schmude, 901 F.2d 555, 559 (7th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Anderson, 72 F.3d 563, 566 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996) (finding that previ…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Aracelis Paredes
“Rationally, if a defendant has been convicted for the same offense more than once, he has demonstrated the need for greater sanctions to deter him from committing that same crime again— greater sanctions than might be required for a defendant who has never been convicted of a similar offense.” Schmude, 901 F.2d at 559 ; see also United States v. Anderson, 72 F.3d 563, 566 (7th Cir.1995) (finding that previous convictions for similar crimes constituted “a clear ground for a heavier sentence”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alvarez-Figueroa
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-8378.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1996.
517 U.S. 1162
1996 U.S. LEXIS 2787
Cited by 29 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.