Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Barragan-Gutierrez v. United States
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F. 3d 1447, 1471 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. Roehrich
See, Amrine v. Bowersox, 128 F.3d 1222, 1228 (8th Cir.1997), cert, denied, 523 U.S. 1123 , 118 S.Ct. 1807 , 140 L.Ed.2d 946 (1998) ("On a gateway claim of actual innocence, a federal court must consider all the evidence to make its own determination whether there is a sufficient showing to justify consideration of a petitioner’s otherwise barred claimsf.]”), citing Schlup v. Delo, supra at 326-330, 115 S.Ct. 851 and Battle v. Delo, 64 F.3d 347, 352 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied sub. nom., Battle v. Bowersox, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); Buff v. Purkett, 2007 WL 1…
cited
Cited "see"
Alba v. Quarterman
See Rogers v. Scott, 70 F.3d 340, 342 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied sub. nom Rogers v. Johnson, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lindsey
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1471 (10th Cir. 1995), cert, denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996). “[T]he allegations must be specific and particularized, not general or eoncluso-ry.” Id. ....
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gill
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1471 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996). “[T]he allegations must be specific and particularized, not general or eonelusory.” Id.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chandler
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1471 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996). “[T]he allegations must be specific and particularized, not general or conclusory.” Id.
cited
Cited "see"
Hollie v. Booher
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Broades v. Gibson
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Raven v. Attorney General-OK
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Gary Lee Cooper v. William T. Schear, Sheriff Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Gary Lee Cooper v. Adams County Court, Division 2 Robert Grant, Adams County District Attorney
See Hatch v. State, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir.1995). cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Cooper v. Schear
See Hatch v. State, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir. 1995). cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Arnold v. Zavaras
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Arnold v. Zavaras
See Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1453 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnson
See also Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1465 (10th Cir.1995) (noting that although the Court has subsequently called into doubt some of the logic of Williams, the Court has not called into doubt the essence of its holding that unadjudicated crimes may constitutionally be considered in imposing a death sentence), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); Devier v. Zant, 3 F.3d 1445, 1464-65 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1161 , 115 S.Ct. 1125 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1087 (1995); Williams v. Lynaugh, 814 F.2d 205, 207-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 935 , 108 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sampson
See, e.g., Hatch v. State, 58 F.3d 1447, 1465 (10th Cir.1995) (upholding use of prior unadjudicated conduct from due process challenge), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); United States v. Cooper, 91 F.Supp.2d 90, 106-107 (D.D.C.2000) and cases cited (allowing evidence of uncharged racketeering offenses, robbery, shootings and handgun offenses); United States v. Davis, 912 F.Supp. at 949 (allowing prior misconduct as long as its use does not violate other safeguards).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. Holder
(2×)
See also Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1465 (10th Cir.1995) (noting that although the Court has subsequently called into doubt some of the logic of Williams, the Court has not called into doubt the essence of its holding that unadjudicated crimes may constitutionally be considered in imposing a death sentence), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); Devier v. Zant, 3 F.3d 1445, 1464-65 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1161 , 115 S.Ct. 1125 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1087 (1995); Williams v. Lynaugh, 814 F.2d 205, 207-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 935 , 108 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen
See also Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1465 (10th Cir. 1995) (noting that although the Court has subsequently called into doubt some of the logic of Williams, the Court has not called into doubt the essence of its holding that unadjudicated crimes may constitutionally be considered in imposing a death sentence), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 (1996); Devier v. Zant, 3 F.3d 1445, 1464-65 (11th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1161 (1995); Williams v. Lynaugh, 814 F.2d 205, 207-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 935 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lord Day & Lord v. Socialist Republic of Vietnam
See also To v. Rubin, 99 F.3d 400 , 1995 WL 723130 , at *3 (2d Cir. Dec. 6, 1995) (dismissing as moot claim to unfrozen assets by South Vietnamese and citing favorably to the United States Government brief, supra), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1880 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); To v. Bank of New York, 101 F.3d 681 , 1996 WL 146517 , at *2 (2d Cir. Apr. 1, 1996) (acknowledging Vietnam as succeeding to the frozen assets). 15 Thus, Vietnam argues that the Executive Agreement makes determination here a non-justiciable question by requiring all assets of the former Republic to be transferred…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edelin
See also Hatch v. Oklahoma, 58 F.3d 1447, 1465 (10th Cir.1995) .(citing Williams and Nichols and concluding that the admission of evidence of unadjudicated offenses at a capital sentencing proceeding does not violate due process), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); accord, Devier v. Zant, 3 F.3d 1445, 1464-65 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1161 , 115 *77 S.Ct. 1125, 130 L.Ed.2d 1087 (1995); Williams v. Lynaugh, 814 F.2d 205, 208 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 935 , 108 S.Ct. 311 , 98 L.Ed.2d 270 (1987); United States v. Bradley, 880 F.Supp. 271,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gilbert
See, e.g., Hatch v. State, 58 F.3d 1447, 1465 (10th Cir.1995) (upholding use of prior unadjudicated conduct from due process challenge), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); United States v. Coo *152 per, 91 F.Supp.2d 90, 106-107 (D.D.C.2000) and cases cited (allowing evidence of uncharged racketeering offenses, robbery, shootings and handgun offenses); United States v. Davis, 912 F.Supp. at 949 (allowing prior misconduct as long as its use does not violate other safeguards).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Williams
(2×)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Hill, 542 Pa. 291, 315 , 666 A.2d 642, 654 (1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1880 , 135 L.Ed.2d 175 (1996); Commonwealth v. Fahy, 512 Pa. 298, 315-16 , 516 A.2d 689, 697-98 (1986); Commonwealth v. Beasley, 504 Pa. 485, 498-99 , 475 A.2d 730, 737 (1984). [15] We decline to do so.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McMillan
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-1778.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 3, 1996.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.