green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Minella v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TX
See Pittman v. Chicago Bd. of Educ., 64 F.3d 1098, 1104 (7th Cir.1995) (principal’s tenure rights could be changed by statutory amendment without running afoul of Loudermill), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2497 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); Harris v. Iles, Nos. 86-6761 & 87-6562, 1989 WL 88413 , at *3-4 (9th Cir. July 31, 1989) (employee had no entitlement to prior statutory standard for discharge despite holding of Loudermill, after amendment substituted “at the pleasure of the judges” standard for court clerks); Gottis v. Gravett, 806 F.2d 778, 781 (8th Cir.1986) (Loudermill notw…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Beyond. Com Corp.
See In re Lowenschuss, 67 F.3d 1394, 1401 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2497 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); In re Commercial Western Finance Corp., 761 F.2d 1329, 1338 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zealy v. City of Waukesha
See Pittman v. Chicago Board of Education, 64 F.3d 1098, 1104 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2497 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, Indiana, 57 F.3d 505, 513 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 672 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Johnston
Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 176.9 with 18 U.S.C. § 2518 ; see United States v. Edwards, 69 F.3d 419, 429 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2497 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United States
Water Dist. v. United States, 708 F.3d 1340, 1359 (Fed.Cir.2013) (emphasis in original) (quoting Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States, 855 F.2d 1573, 1577 (Fed.Cir.1988)); see also Navajo Nation v. United States, 631 F.3d 1268, 1273-74 (Fed.Cir.2011) (“In general, a takings ‘claim first accrues when all the events have occurred which fix the alleged liability of the [government] and entitle the plaintiff to institute an action.’ ”) (quoting Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States, 855 F.2d at 1577 (citing Fallini v. United States, 56 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1995), cer t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Etchegoinberry v. United States
Water Dist. v. United States, 708 F.3d at 1359 (emphasis in original) (quoting Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States, 855 F.2d 1573, 1577 (Fed.Cir.1988)); see also Navajo Nation v. United States, 631 F.3d 1268, 1273-74 (Fed.Cir.2010) (“In general, a takings ‘claim first accrues when all the events have occurred which fix the alleged liability of the [government] and entitle the plaintiff to institute an action.’” (quoting Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States, 855 F.2d at 1577 (citing Fallini v. United States, 56 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 12…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McGhee
See United States v. Adcock, 558 F.2d 397, 406 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 921 , 98 S.Ct. 395 , 54 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977); see also United States v. Edwards, 69 F.3d 419, 437 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2497 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Lowenschuss, 67 F.3d 1394, 1401 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2497 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 *603 (1996)("This court has repeatedly held without exception, that § 524(e) precludes bankruptcy courts from discharging the liabilities of nondebtors.”); In re Zale Corp., 62 F.3d 746, 760 (5th Cir.1995)("[A] temporary stay prohibiting a creditor’s suit against a non-debtor ... may not be extended post-confirmation in the form of a permanent injunction that effectively relieves the nondebtor from its own liability to the creditor.”); In re Western Real Estate…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Lowenschuss, 67 F.3d 1394, 1401 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2497 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996) ("This court has repeatedly held without exception, that § 524(e) precludes bankruptcy courts from discharging the liabilities of non-debtors.”); In re Zale Corp., 62 F.3d 746, 760 (5th Cir.1995) ("[A] temporary stay prohibiting a creditor's suit against a nondebtor ... may not be extended post-confirmation in the form of a permanent injunction that effectively relieves the nondebtor from its own liability to the creditor.”); In re Western Real Estate Fund…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kessler v. Grand Central District Management Association, Inc.
Moreover, Arizona could rationally make the weight of their vote dependent upon the number of acres they own, since that number reasonably reflects the relative risks they incurred as landowners and the distribution of the benefits and the burdens of the District's water operations. 89 Id.; see also Salyer, 410 U.S. at 731 , 93 S.Ct. 1224 . 90 Thus, the general framework established by the Supreme Court is that elective bodies performing governmental functions that "are general enough and have sufficient impact throughout the district," Board of Estimate v. Morris, 489 U.S. at 696 , 109 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ariadne Financial Services Pty. Ltd. And Memvale Pty. Ltd. v. United States
See United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17, 27 , 78 S.Ct. 1039,1047 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1958) (“The expressly limited holding in Dickinson was that the statute of limitations did not bar an action under the Tucker Act for a taking by flooding when it was uncertain at what stage in the flooding operation the land had become appropriated to public use.”) (emphasis added); see also Fallini v. United States, 56 F.3d 1378, 1381-82 (Fed.Cir.1995) (collecting cases), cert, denied 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2496 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996); Applegate v. United States, 25 F.3d 1579 (Fed.Cir.1994) (applying st…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cristina Investment Corp. v. United States
Ltd. v. United States, 133 F.3d 874, 878-79 (Fed.Cir.1998); see also Fallini v. United States, 56 F.3d 1378,1381-82 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1243 , 116 S.Ct. 2496 , 135 L.Ed.2d 189 (1996), and therefore is not the proper analytical framework to apply to determine when a takings claim challenging a government permit denial accrues.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.
v.
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of Labor
v.
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of Labor
No. 95-1081.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1996.
517 U.S. 1243
1996 U.S. LEXIS 3874
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1186.] Motion of the parties to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.