discussed Cited "see" United States v. Garcia See United States v. Kirkland, 104 F.3d 1403, 1406 (D.C.Cir.) (“It may be that a situation could be presented in which an entrapment defense is not logically inconsistent with a finding of a defendant's acceptance of responsibility, even though we doubt it (that three of our sister circuits seem to think so is sufficient reason to be somewhat cautious), but certainly defense counsel’s argument before the district court did not raise it.”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1246 , 117 S.Ct. 1857 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1059 (1997).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Russell Francis Chevre See United States v. Kirkland, 104 F.3d 1403, 1405-06 (D.C.Cir.) (defendant alleging entrapment cannot receive downward departure for acceptance of responsibility on the sole basis that he admitted committing the conduct leading to conviction), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1857 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1059 (1997).