Hedrick v. Apfel, 525 U.S. 949 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Hedrick v. Apfel, 525 U.S. 949 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. David Dean Millard (ca8, 2000-12-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. David Dean Millard
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Millard, 139 F.3d 1200, 1206-07 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 949 , 119 S.Ct. 376 , 142 L.Ed.2d 311 (1998).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bob Brumley
7th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Millard, 139 F.3d 1200 , 1205 n. 4 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 949, 119 S.Ct. 376 , 142 L.Ed.2d 311 (1998).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Monica Ann White
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Millard, 139 F.3d 1200, 1209 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 376 (1998).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ronald Haukaas
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Millard, 139 F.3d 1200, 1204 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 376 (U.S. Oct. 19, 1998) (No. 98-460).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ronald R. Haukaas, III (2×)
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Millard, 139 F.3d 1200, 1204 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 376 , 142 L.Ed.2d 311 (1998) (No. 98-460). 14 Evidence is only admissible under Rule 404(b) "when it is (1) relevant to a material issue; (2) proved by a preponderance of the evidence; (3) higher in probative value than in prejudicial effect; and (4) similar in kind and close in time to the crime charged." United States v. McCarthy, 97 F.3d 1562 , 1572 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1139 , 117 S.Ct. 1011 , 136 L.Ed.2d 888 (1997) (No. 96-7461) (citation omitted).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." No. 98-1587
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b); see also, e.g., United States v. Millard, 139 F.3d 1200, 1203 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 376 , 142 L.Ed.2d 311 (1998). 9 Of the numerous circuit courts that have considered the argument that such plea agreements violate § 201(c)(2), only one has found it persuasive, see United States v. Singleton, 144 F.3d 1343, 1345-51 (10th Cir.1998), vacated, 144 F.3d 1361 (10th Cir.1998) (en banc ), and even that result was undone en banc, see United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297, 1299-1302 (10th Cir.1999) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Mar. …
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Joseph Trent Mosby
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
R.Crim.P. 52(b); see also, e.g., United States v. Millard, 139 F.3d 1200, 1203 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 119 S.Ct. 376 , 142 L.Ed.2d 311 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hedrick
v.
Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security
No. 98-438.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1998.
525 U.S. 949
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.