green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Noguera v. Davis
See *1016 Babbitt v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 1170 , 1173 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1159 , 119 S.Ct. 1068 , 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Duvardo v. Giurbino
See Babbitt v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 1170, 1173 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1159 , 119 S.Ct. 1068 , 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: Anthony Braden Bryan
See Bryan v. Singletary, 140 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1159 , 119 S.Ct. 1068 , 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Bryan v. State
See Bryan v. Singletary, 525 U.S. 1159 , 119 S.Ct. 1068 , 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boulware v. Marshall
The test is “only whether some reasonable lawyer ... could have acted, in the circumstances, as defense counsel acted.” Coleman v. Calderon, 150 F.3d 1105, 1113 (9th Cir.) (citations and quotations omitted), rev’d on other grounds, 525 U.S. 141 , 119 S.Ct. 500 , 142 L.Ed.2d 521 (1998); see also Babbitt v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 1170, 1173-74 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1159 , 119 S.Ct. 1068 , 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999) (relevant inquiry under Strickland is not what defense counsel could have pursued, but rather whether the choices made by defense counsel were reasonable) (citation and …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramirez v. Almager
The test is “only whether some reasonable lawyer ... could have acted, in the circumstances, as defense counsel acted.” Coleman v. Calderon, 150 F.3d 1105, 1113 (9th Cir.) (citations and quotations omitted), rev’d on other grounds, 525 U.S. 141 , 119 S.Ct. 500 , 142 L.Ed.2d 521 (1998); see also Babbitt v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 1170, 1173-74 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1159 , 119 S.Ct. 1068 , 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999) (relevant inquiry under Strickland is not what defense counsel could have pursued, but rather whether the choices made by defense counsel were reasonable) (citation and …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boultinghouse v. Hall
The test is “only whether some reasonable lawyer ... could have acted, in the circumstances, as defense counsel acted.” Coleman v. Calderon, 150 F.3d 1105, 1113 (9th Cir.) (citations and quotations omitted), rev’d on other grounds, 525 U.S. 141 , 119 S.Ct. 500 , 142 L.Ed.2d 521 (1998); see also Babbitt v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 1170, 1173-74 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1159 , 119 S.Ct. 1068 , 143 L.Ed.2d 72 (1999) (relevant inquiry under Strickland is not what defense counsel could have pursued, but rather whether the choices made by defense counsel were reasonable) (citation and …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitlatch
v.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
v.
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
No. 98-7373.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1999.
525 U.S. 1159
Published
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.