discussed Cited "see, e.g." McDowell v. Mississippi The Court summarized its “unreasonable application” clause analysis as follows: “[A] federal habeas Court may grant the writ if the state Court identifies the correct governing legal principle from this Court’s decisions but unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of that prisoner’s case.” Id. at 413 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 ; see also Tucker v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 617 , 621 & n. 5 (5th Cir.)(quoting and following Williams’ “unreasonable application” analysis), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 972 , 122 S.Ct. 18 , 150 L.Ed.2d 800 (2001).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Morrow v. Dretke Williams, 529 U.S. at 411 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 ; see also Tucker v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 617, 620-21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 972 , 122 S.Ct. 18 , 150 L.Ed.2d 800 (2001). 12 .