discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction October 9, 2014) (same); Ferguson v. State, 325 S.W.3d 400, 413 (Mo. App. 2010) (‘‘[w]e must deny [the petitioner’s] second Brady claim for a similar reason as we denied his first Brady claim, namely that the motion court made . . . detailed findings that the [new witness testi- mony] in question was not credible and thus was not a basis for a meritorious Brady claim’’); State v. Mau, Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Docket No. 99- 0406-CR (Wis. App. March 15, 2000) (deferring to trial court’s decision, in context of Strickland claim, to credit state’s expert and not defendant’s exp…