green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2005 ·
…who has contributed or who is contributing to the past or present handling, storage, treatment, transportation, or disposal of any solid or hazardous waste which may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to health or the environment.
⚠ not in text
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sawyer
See, e.g., United States v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306, 1316 (11th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1134 , 125 S. Ct. 2951 , 162 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hechinger Litigation Trust v. Bankboston Retail Finance, Inc.
See also Interfaith Comm. Org. v. Honeywell Intern., Inc., 399 F.3d 248 , 254 (3d Cir.2005), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2951 , 162 L.Ed.2d 869 (2005) (summarizing clear error review).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Schwartz
Under this standard, non-constitutional error is harmless if other evidence of guilt is so “overwhelming” and the error so insignificant by comparison that we can conclude the error “failed to have any ‘substantial influence’ on the verdict.” United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 450 , 106 S.Ct. 725, 732 , 88 L.Ed.2d 814, 826 (1986) (quoting Kotteakos, 328 U.S. at 765 , 66 S.Ct. at 1248 , 90 L.Ed. at 1567 ); see also United States v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306, 1316-17 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 73 U.S.L.W. 3733 , — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2951 , 162 L.Ed.2d 877 (June 20, 2005) (discuss…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Honeywell International Inc.
v.
Interfaith Community Organization
v.
Interfaith Community Organization
No. 04-1560.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 2005.
545 U.S. 1129
2005 U.S. LEXIS 4895
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.