discussed Cited "see" Colbert v. Union Pacific Railroad See Felix v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1156 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1149 , 125 S.Ct. 2961 , 162 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005); Meyer v. Conlon, 162 F.3d 1264 , 1268 n. 2 (10th Cir.1998); Carland v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

discussed Cited "see" R.G. v. Koller See Demery v. Arpaio, 378 F.3d 1020, 1027 (9th Cir.2004) (affirming entry of a preliminary injunction based on determination that plaintiffs who had been arrested and incarcerated *1137 repeatedly were likely to be re-incarcerated and subjected to the same unconstitutional conditions), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2961 , 162 L.Ed.2d 887 (2005).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Negron-Fuentes v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions Compare Felix v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1162 (10th Cir.2004), ce rt. denied, 545 U.S. 1149 , 125 S.Ct. 2961 , 162 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005), with Law v. Ernst & Young, 956 F.2d 364 , 370 n. 9 (1st Cir.1992). 5 .