green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neil O'Brien v. John Welty
We noted that “harass” “[is] not [an] esoteric or complicated term[ ] devoid of common understanding.” Id. at 945 ; see also United States v. Shrader, 675 F.3d 300, 310 (4th Cir.2012) (“ ‘Harass’ and ‘intimidate’ are not obscure words.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 757 , 184 L.Ed.2d 500 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Marvin Watkins
See, e.g., United States v. Shrader, 675 F.3d 300, 306-07 (4th Cir.2012) (noting that Randolph set forth a “clearly drawn rule” that a defendant must be both present and objecting), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 757 , 184 L.Ed.2d 500 (2012), reh’g denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1320 , 185 L.Ed.2d 236 (2013); United States v. Cooke, 674 F.3d 491, 499 (5th Cir.2012) (holding that the “objection of an absent cotenant does not vitiate the consent of a physically present cotenant” and noting that the Supreme Court seemed to have structured Randolph as “an exception to the general r…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aguillard
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 12-5334.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 2012.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.