discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Owusu Firempong in the case of a narcotics conspiracy, this mandatory liability is joint and several among all conspira 499 tors.

cited Cited "see" United States v. Ramos See United States v. Roberts, 660 F.3d 149, 156 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1640 , 182 L.Ed.2d 239 (2012).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Christopher Elder Accord United States v. Roberts, 660 F.3d 149, 165-66 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1640 , 182 L.Ed.2d 239 (2012); United States v. Pitt, 193 F.3d 751, 765 (3d Cir.1999); United States v. Candelaria-Silva, 166 F.3d 19, 44 (1st Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1055 , 120 S.Ct. 1559 , 146 L.Ed.2d 463 (2000); United States v. McHan, 101 F.3d 1027, 1043 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1281 , 117 S.Ct. 2468 , 138 L.Ed.2d 223 (1997). 5 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Terry Honeycutt (2×) See, e.g., United States v. Roberts, 660 F.3d 149, 165 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1640 , 182 L.Ed.2d 239 (2012) (“In the case of a narcotics conspiracy [under § 853(a)(1) ], this -mandatory liability- [regarding forfeiture].- is joint and several among all conspirators.”); United States v. Van Nguyen, 602 F.3d 886, 904 (8th Cir. 2010) (holding that under ,§ -853, a defendant “may be held jointly and severally liable for all. of the foreseeable proceeds of the conspiracy”); United States v. Pitt, 193 F.3d 751, 765 (3d Cir.1999) (“21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1) impo…