examined Cited as authority (quoted) Ex Parte Leonard Walton Fusselman the congressional choice to regulate child pornography by defining minor as an individual under eighteen is rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in enforcing child pornography laws.

examined Cited as authority (quoted) Ex Parte Leonard Walton Fusselman the congressional choice to regulate child pornography by defining minor as an individual under eighteen is rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in enforcing child pornography laws.

examined Cited as authority (quoted) Ex Parte Leonard Walton Fusselman the congressional choice to regulate child pornography by defining minor as an individual under eighteen is rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in enforcing child pornography laws.

discussed Cited "see" State v. Zidel (2×) See United States v. Bach, 400 F.3d 622, 632 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 901 (2005) (concluding that image depicting the head of “AC, an identifiable minor child” on the nude body of an unidentified boy in a sexually explicit pose, “created an identifiable child victim [ie., AC] of sexual exploitation”).