discussed Cited "see" United States v. Roderick Maxie See United States v. Noe, 411 F.3d 878 , 886 (8th Cir.2005), cert, denied, 546 U.S. 892 , 126 S.Ct. 184 , 163 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005), and cert, denied, 546 U.S. 1201 , 126 S.Ct. 1403 , 164 L.Ed.2d 103 (2006).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Hernandez See United States v. Barrera-Medina, 139 Fed.Appx. 786, 796-98 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1403 , 164 L.Ed.2d 103 (2006).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Candelario Silvestre Beltran-Munguia (2×) Neither[§ 2L1.2] nor its commentary in explicit words refer to crimes that "involve conduct that presents a serious risk of physical injury to another." 39 Accordingly, we conclude that ... [a case] holding that California Penal Code section 246 is a "crime of violence" [for purposes of § 4B1.2] because it involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical injury to another does not necessarily resolve the question of whether the same offense is a "crime of violence" for purposes of USSG § 2L1.2. 40 403 F.3d at 1114 (citing United States v. Weinert, 1 F.3d 889 (9th Cir.1993) (per cur…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bertan-Manguia Neither [§ 2L1.2] nor its commentary in explicit words refer to crimes that “involve conduct that presents a serious risk of physical injury to another.” Accordingly, we conclude that . . . [a case] holding that California Penal Code section 246 is a “crime of violence” [for purposes of § 4B1.2] because it UNITED STATES v. BELTRAN-MUNGUIA 6889 involves conduct that presents a serious risk of phys- ical injury to another does not necessarily resolve the question of whether the same offense is a “crime of violence” for purposes of USSG § 2L1.2. 403 F.3d at 1114 (citing United Stat…