green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kevin Jerome Smart
See United States v. Lee, 427 F.3d 881, 892 (11th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1447 , 164 L.Ed.2d 145 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valentin Munoz Arenas
See United States v. Lee, 427 F.3d 881, 892 (11th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1447 , 164 L.Ed.2d 145 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cuevas
We consider Cuevas’s objections to the District Court’s Guidelines calculations, however, because “the district court, on remand, remains under an obligation to consider the Guidelines, and our resolution of [a] defendants] Guidelines objections “will assist the district court in fulfilling that obligation.’ ” Id. (quoting United States v. Ma-loney, 406 F.3d 149,152 (2d Cir.2005)); see also United States v. Carr, 424 F.3d 213, 230 (2d Cir.2005) (considering the defendant’s objection to the district court’s previous application of the Sentencing Guidelines before remanding, and …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cuevas
United States v. Garcia, 413 F.3d 201, 222 (2d Cir. 2005). 21 We consider Cuevas’s objections to the District Court’s Guidelines calculations, however, 22 because “the district court, on remand, remains under an obligation to consider the Guidelines, 17 1 and our resolution of [a] defendant[’s] Guidelines objections ‘will assist the district court in 2 fulfilling that obligation.’” Id. (quoting United States v. Maloney, 406 F.3d 149, 152 (2d Cir. 3 2005)); see also United States v. Carr, 424 F.3d 213, 230 (2d Cir. 2005) (considering the 4 defendant’s objection to the district c…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carr
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 05-8901.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 2006.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.