Randle v. United States, 531 U.S. 1136 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Randle v. United States, 531 U.S. 1136 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …could inappropriately influence the defendant to waive his constitutional right not to testify, thus threatening the exercise of this other, converse, constitutionally explicit, and more fragile right. ⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …evidence that a buyer purchased some of the cocaine on consignment . . . is 'strong evidence' of membership in a conspiracy because it indicates a strong level of trust and an ongoing, mutually dependent relationship. ⚠ not in text
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Moore (ca5, 2025-02-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Moore
5th Cir. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
here, law enforcement found a handgun with an obliterated serial number in the same room as a baggie with numerous empty clear capsules.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Clovis Prince
5th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 217 F.3d 247, 258 (5th Cir. 2000), vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom, Randle v. United States, 531 U.S. 1136 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Clovis Prince (2×)
5th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 217 F.3d 247, 258 (5th Cir.2000), vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom, Randle v. United States, 531 U.S. 1136 , 121 S.Ct. 1072 , 148 L.Ed.2d 950 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Royce Rice (2×)
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 217 F.3d 247, 255 (5th Cir.2000) (holding that the defendants were members of a conspiracy where they “refer[ed] customers to each other when unable to supply customers themselves”), vacated and remanded on other grounds sub nom, Randle v. United States, 531 U.S. 1136 , 121 S.Ct. 1072 , 148 L.Ed.2d 950 (2001); United States v. James, 540 F.3d 702, 707 (7th Cir.2008) (finding a conspiracy where, among other things, the defendant and his co-conspirators “would refer customers to other members’ drug houses if his or her supply of crack was low”).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Randle (2×)
5th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Randle v. United States, 531 U.S. 1136 , 121 S.Ct. 1072 , 148 L.Ed.2d 950 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jacquinot
5th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 217 F.3d 247, 261 (5th Cir.2000) (applying § 2Dl.l(b)(l) adjustment where shotgun found in truck of vehicle used to transport drugs), vacated on other grounds by Randle v. United States, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1072 , 148 L.Ed.2d 950 (2001); United States v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 929, 932 (5th Cir.1995) (applying § 2Dl.l(b)(l) adjustment where gun found under the seat of car used in attempted theft of narcotics).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Randle
v.
United States
No. 00-6774.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 2001.
531 U.S. 1136
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U. S. 466 (2000).