Quoc Thai Minh Thuy v. United States, 534 U.S. 1032 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Quoc Thai Minh Thuy v. United States, 534 U.S. 1032 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the first exception clearly does not apply here because apprendi did not place drug conspiracies beyond the scope of the state's authority to proscribe.”
66 citation events (66 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz Tapia (2×) also: Cited "see"
9th Cir. · 2002 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the first exception clearly does not apply here because apprendi did not place drug conspiracies beyond the scope of the state's authority to proscribe.
discussed Cited "see" Strickland v. Lee
W.D.N.C. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348, 357 , 124 S.Ct. 2519, 2526 , 159 L.Ed.2d 442 (2004) (“Ring [v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 , 122 S.Ct. 2428 , 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002) ] announced a new procedural rule that does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review.”).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ringer
10th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ringer, 9 Fed.Appx. 844 (10th Cir.2001) (unpublished), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Elda San Juanita Regalado v. United States
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1097 , 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); Jones v. Smith, 231 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir.2000); McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002). 8 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Smith
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Robbie James Lyons v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Robbie James Lyons v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Hartman v. Lee, 283 F.3d 190 , 192 n. 2 (4th Cir.2002).
cited Cited "see" Lyons v. Lee
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Hartman v. Lee, 283 F.3d 190 , 192 n. 2 (4th Cir.2002).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Cross
4th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Manigault
4th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 144 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Lyons v. Lee
M.D.N.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Saylor v. State
Ind. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.) cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001) ("neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have held that Apprendi is retroactively applicable on collateral attack.") Several district courts have held that Apprendi does apply to habeas corpus petitions.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bridges
D. Kan. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.) (concluding Apprendi did not apply retroactively to collateral review of initial § 2255 motion), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Davlin
Neb. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See, State v. Redmond, 262 Neb. 411 , 631 N.W.2d 501 (2001), cert. denied 534 U.S. 1033 , 122 S. Ct. 573 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sifuentes
10th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.) (concluding Apprendi did not apply retroactively to collateral review of initial § 2255 motion), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Browning v. United States, 241 F.3d 1262, 1266 (10th Cir.2001) (en banc) (concluding Apprendi does not apply to second or successive habeas petitions, absent express direction from the Supreme Court); Jones v. Smith, 231 F.3d 1227, 1238 (9th Cir.2000) (concluding Apprendi did not apply retroactively to collateral review of § 2254 motion).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Collins
4th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
CR-91-312; CA-01-2729-1-22 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 17, 2001; entered Oct. 18, 2001); see also United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001) (holding claims pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), are not cognizable on collateral review).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Quoc Thai Minh Thuy
v.
United States
No. 01-6709.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 2001.
534 U.S. 1032
Cited by 62 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.