Grantwood Vill. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 519 U.S. 1149 (1997). · Go Syfert
Grantwood Vill. v. Missouri Pac. R.R., 519 U.S. 1149 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Central Airlines, Inc. v. United States (ca8, 1998-03-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Central Airlines, Inc. v. United States (4×) also: Cited "see"
8th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
Dismissal is inappropriate "unless it appears beyond doubt [the carriers] can prove no set of facts in support of [their constitutional] claim[s] which would entitle [them] to relief." Id. at 266 (internal quotations omitted).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Central Airlines, Inc. v. United States (4×) also: Cited "see"
8th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
Dismissal is inappropriate “unless it appears beyond doubt [the carriers] can prove no set of facts in support of [their constitutional] claim[s] which would entitle [them] to relief.” Id. at 266 (internal quotations omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Wilson v. Layne (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
4th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Charles T. Hutchins v. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer Louis Delucia John Does \1\" Through John Does \"3\" Joan Lavery. Charles T. Hutchins v. Abc Corp.
3rd Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Such a requirement would bypass internal controls and hotlines, damage corporate efforts at self-policing, and make it difficult for corporations and boards of directors to discover and correct on their own false claims made by rogue employees or managers."); see also Childree v. UAP/GA Chem, Inc., 92 F.3d 1140, 1146 (11th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1148 , 137 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rama
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Leslie Salt Co., supra, (holding that clause “shall be subject to a civil penalty” mandated imposition of penalty), with Spradling v. City of Tulsa, 95 F.3d 1492, 1501 (10th Cir.1996) (ruling that phrase “subject to reduction” means “possibility.”) (cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1081 , 137 L.Ed.2d 216 ) and People v. Postall, 153 Misc.2d 167 , 580 N.Y.S.2d 975, 980 (1992) (declaring that postal service regulation that “[ejmployee lockers are subject to inspection” did not constitute blanket consent to search because phrase “subject to” is ambiguous; it can mea…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grantwood Village
v.
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
No. 96-931.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1997.
519 U.S. 1149
1997 U.S. LEXIS 1299

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.