Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei, 569 U.S. 945 (2013). · Go Syfert
Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei, 569 U.S. 945 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013 2019 2026
Cited for
The text of the Alien Tort Statute provides no express exception for corporations . . .no pin page on record · 1 citing case listed
  • John Doe I v. Nestle, USA, 766 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2014).published 3 cites
    (The text of the Alien Tort Statute provides no express exception for corporations . . .)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“the text of the alien tort statute provides no express exception for corporations . . .”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 1 citing case listed
  • John Doe I v. Nestle, USA, 766 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2014).published 3 cites
    “the text of the alien tort statute provides no express exception for corporations . . .”
Other citing cases5 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RIO TINTO PLC
v.
Alexis Holyweek SAREI
No. 11–649..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 2013.
Published opinion
569 U.S. 945
2013 WL 1704704
2013 U.S. LEXIS 3271
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Motion of Government of Australia, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Professors of International Law, Foreign Relations Law and Federal Jurisdiction for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of National Foreign Trade Council, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.