Wilson v. State of North Carolina, 169 U.S. 600 (1898). · Go Syfert
Search
Wilson v. State of North Carolina, 169 U.S. 600 (1898). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1948 · …duty personal with the officer ⚠ not in text
78 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Northwestern Lumber & Shingle Co. v. United States (ca10, 1948-11-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1902 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1902 1964 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Northwestern Lumber & Shingle Co. v. United States
10th Cir. · 1948 · confidence medium
Bernardin v. Butterworth, 169 U.S. 600, 603, 604 , 18 S.Ct. 441 , 42 L.Ed. 873 ; Murphy v. Utter, 186 U.S. 95, 100, 101 , 22 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed. 1070 ; Warner Valley Stock Co. v. Smith, 165 U.S. 28, 31, 32 , 17 S.Ct. 225 , 41 L.Ed. 621 ; Pullman Co. v. Knott, 243 U.S. 447, 449, 451 , 37 S.Ct. 428 , 61 L.Ed. 841 ; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U.S. 487, 492 , 31 S.Ct. 43 , 54 L.Ed. 1121 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Crigler, County Clerk v. Nichols
Okla. · 1915 · confidence medium
Nor is it a suit against the Secretary of State, as one of a corporation or continuing board, 'where the obligations sought to be enforced devolve upon a corporation or continuing body,’ as pointed out in United States v. Butterworth, 169 U. S. 600, 603 [18 Sup. Ct. 441, 442 ( 42 L.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Caledonian Coal Co. v. Baker
unknown court · 1905 · confidence medium
At all events, he is not in privity with his «predecessor, much less is he his predecessor’s personal representative.' As might be expected, therefore, we find rio case in which such a substitution as is asked for now has ever been allowed in the absence of some statute authorizing it.” That case was followed by United States v. Chandler, 122 U. S. 643 ; United States v. Lochren, 164 U. S. 701 ; Warner Valley Stock Co. v. Smith, 165 U. S. 28 , and United States ex rel. &c. v. Butterworth, 169 U. S. 600, 604, 605 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilson
v.
State of North Carolina
559.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1898.
169 U.S. 600
1898 U.S. LEXIS 1510
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

169 U.S. 600

18 S.Ct. 949

42 L.Ed. 873

WILSON
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 559.

March 21, 1898.

R. O. Burton and Thomas N. Hill, for plaintiff in error.

J. C. MacRae, W. H. Day, and A. C. Avery, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

1

In No. 558 (Wilson v. North Carolina, 18 Sup. Ct. 435) the same questions are involved and the same orders are made.