green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1981 ·
…from a final decision by a court of the united states in a proceeding in habeas corpus where the detention complained of is by virtue of process issued out of a state court no appeal to the supreme court shall be allowed unless the united states court by which the final decision…
at p. 551
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1908 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1908
1967
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
William Davis v. Thomas L. Jacobs, Commissioner of Probation and John T. Reed v. Carl Ajello, Attorney General of Connecticut
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The Court relied upon the Act of Mar. 10, 1908, ch. 76, 35 Stat. 40 , which provides as follows: "[F]rom a final decision by a court of the United States in a proceeding in habeas corpus where the detention complained of is by virtue of process issued out of a State court no appeal to the Supreme Court shall be allowed unless the United States court by which the final decision was rendered or a justice of the Supreme Court shall be of opinion that there exists probable cause for an appeal, in which event, on allowing the same, the said court or justice shall certify that there is probable caus…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Davis v. Jacobs
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The Court relied upon the Act of Mar. 10,1908, ch. 76, 35 Stat. 40 , which provides as follows: “[F]rom a final decision by a court of the United States in a proceeding in habeas corpus where the detention complained of is by virtue of process issued out of a State court no appeal to the Supreme Court shall be allowed unless the United States court by which the final decision was rendered or a justice of the Supreme Court shall be of opinion that there exists probable cause for an appeal, in which event, on allowing the same, the said court or justice shall certify that there is probable cau…
cited
Cited "see"
Comerford v. Hogsett
See Bilik v. Strassheim, 212 U. S. 551 , 29 S. Ct. 684 , 53 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schenk v. Plummer
See, also, Bilik v. Strassheim, 212 U.S. 551 , 29 S.Ct. 684 , 53 L.Ed. 649 ; Ex parte Patrick, 212 U.S. 555 , 29 S.Ct. 686 , 53 L.Ed. 650 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BILIK
v.
STRASSHEIM, SHERIFF OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
v.
STRASSHEIM, SHERIFF OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
445.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1908.
Cited by 21 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
Mr. Francis E. Hinckley and Mr. S.S. Gregory for appellant.
Mr. John J. Healy, State Attorney, Mr. Erasmus C. Lindley and Mr. James J. Barbour for appellee.
No. 445, Motion to dismiss or affirm.
Per Curiam:
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.