green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Cited for
At page 451 cited at this page1 citing case
- Barbara W. Wolff & Janice Wheeler Tinker v. United States, 967 F.2d 222 (6th Cir. 1992).In the situation before us it is also significant, as the caselaw teaches, that the Wheelers’ island was very small and of no apparent value at the time the littoral land was patented; see Moss, 239 U.S. at 546 , 36 S.Ct. at 184 (distingui…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People of the State of Illinois Ex Rel. Gersch,
v.
City of Chicago Et Al.
v.
City of Chicago Et Al.
474.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1913.
Mr. John W. Beckwith and Mr. W: H. Sexton, for the defendants in error, in support of motion to dismiss or affirm., Mr. Allen B. Chilcoat and Mr. Stephen A. Day, for the plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.
White.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Memorandum opinion, by direction of the court, by
Mr. Chief Justice White:This is a companion case to Preston v. City of Chicago, No. 195, just disposed of. Unlike the record in the Preston case, however, the record in this case does not contain the final judgment to which the writ of error is directed. As we cannot assume that a judgment was- in fact entered in the Supreme Court of Illinois, it results that we are without authority to exert jurisdiction.
Writ of error dismissed.