Griffin v. Eller (1996)

State v. Garcia-Martinez, 88 Wash.App. 322, 326 , 944 P.2d 1104 (1997); State v. Shawn P., 122 Wash.2d 553, 559-60 , 859 P.2d 1220 (1993); but see Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wash.2d 58, 64-65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996)(the extent to which the constitutional guarantees in article 1, section 12 exceed those under the Fourteenth Amendment remains an open question).

App. 322, 326 , 944 P.2d 1104 (1997); State v. Shawn P., 122 Wn.2d 553, 559-60 , 859 P.2d 1220 (1993); but see Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 64-65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (the extent to which the constitutional guaranties in article I, section 12 exceed those under the Fourteenth Amendment remains an open question).

But see Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 64-65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (the extent to which the constitutional guarantees in art.

In Griffin , the Washington Supreme Court relied on Far-nam to hold that small employers are statutorily exempt from all provisions of the Washington Law Against Discrimination. 12 See id. at 790(“Having previously determined in Famam that [the Washington Law Against Discrimination] does not support a private cause of action against an exempt employer, we are controlled by that precedent.”).

Compare Madison, 161 Wn.2d at 103 (felons’ right to vote is not an important right), and Seeley v. State, 132 Wn.2d 776, 795 , 940 P.2d 604 (1997) (use of certain drugs, -34- Martinez-Cuevas, et al. v. DeRuyter, et al., 96267-7 (Stephens, C.J., dissenting) like marijuana, as a treatment for a cancer is not an important right), with State v. Manussier, 129 Wn.2d 652, 673-74 , 921 P.2d 473 (1996) (physical liberty is an important right), and Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 65 …

See Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 61, 63-64 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996).

Dissent) violation of his or her civil rights." LAWS OF 1957, ch. 37, § 2; see Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58 , 84 n.7, 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (Talmadge, J., dissenting) (setting out legislative history).

Indeed, well before the legislature created a statutory right of action in 1973, it included the following language in RCW 49.60.020: “Nor shall anything herein contained be construed to deny the right to any person to institute any action or pursue any civil or criminal remedy based upon an alleged violation of his or her civil rights.” Laws of 1957, ch. 37, § 2; see Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58 , 84 n.7, 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (Talmadge, J., dissenting) (setting out legisla…

Legion Post No. 149 v. Dep’t of Health, 164 Wn.2d 570, 609 , 192 P.3d 306 (2008) (quoting Madison v. State, 161 Wn.2d 85, 103 , 163 P.3d 757 (2007))); see also Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (citing In re Pers.

See Jensen, 185 Wash, at 220, 53 P.2d 607 ; Lynden Transp., Inc. v. State, 112 Wash.2d 115, 124 , 768 P.2d 475 (1989) ("intimately and inseparably connected"). "[U]nless we conclude the legislature would have passed the statute absent the unconstitutional provisions, the proper remedy is complete statutory invalidation rather than changing legislative intent by upsetting the legislative compromise." In re Parentage of C.A.M.A., 154 Wash.2d 52, 67 , 109 P.3d 405 (2005); accor…

See, e.g., Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996).

See, e.g., Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wash.2d 58, 65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996).

RCW 49.60.180(2); WAC 162-16-160(4); see also Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wash.2d 58, 64 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996).

RCW 49.60.180(2); WAC 162-16-160(4); see also Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 64 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996).

See Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wash.2d 58, 72 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (Talmadge, J., dissenting). [1] Moreover, I share the view expressed by Justice Alexander in his concurring opinion.

See Grif fin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 72 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (Talmadge, J., dissenting). 16 Moreover, I share the view expressed by Justice Alexander in his concurring opinion.

See Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wash.2d 58, 65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996).

See Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996).

See Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58 , 67 n.l, 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (quoting Michael C.

See also Bennett, 113 Wash.2d at 927 , 784 P.2d 1258 (nothing in RCW 49.60.010 suggests "that the employer definition found in RCW 49.60.040 was intended by the Legislature to narrow the state's overall policy against age discrimination") and Bennett, 113 Wash.2d at 925 , 784 P.2d 1258 (public policy against retaliatory discharge, recognized in RCW 49.60.210 with respect to employers of eight or more, also applies to employers of fewer than eight). [24] Marquis, 130 Wash.2d …

See, e.g., Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wash.2d 58, 65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996); State v. Heiskell, 129 Wash.2d 113, 123 , 916 P.2d 366 (1996). [14] I must confess, even under this standard of virtual judicial abdication, I can still find no rational basis for this statute. [15] Compare Columbia Broadcasting Sys., Inc. v. Democratic Nat'l Comm., 412 U.S. 94, 162 , 93 S.Ct. 2080, 2109 , 36 L.Ed.2d 772 (1973) (Douglas, J., concurring) ("The struggle for liberty has been a struggle again…

See, e.g., Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 65 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996); State v. Heiskell, 129 Wn.2d 113, 123 , 916 P.2d 366 (1996).

See Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wash.2d 58, 77 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (use of word "shall" in a statute generally creates a mandatory duty).

See Griffin v. Eller, 130 Wn.2d 58, 77 , 922 P.2d 788 (1996) (use of word "shall” in a statute generally creates a mandatory duty).