How cited: State v. Lyles · Go Syfert

State v. Lyles (1991)

green · 83 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 23 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 23
Subsequent negative treatment
Receded from in Smith v. State (1992)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199120082026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Wright v. State (1993)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
Id. at 708.
green Domberg v. State (1994)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
That is, the time for appeal from a departure sentence “begins to run from the date the sentencing judgment is filed, not the written reasons.” State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 708 (Fla.1991).
green Adkinson v. State (1991)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The court went on to say that the written reasons “should, if at all possible be filed on the same date; however, a filing on the next business day does not require a new sentencing proceeding.” Lyles at 709 (emphasis supplied).
green Rodriguez-Aguilar v. State (2016)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
“Fundamental principles of justice require that decisions restricting a person’s liberty be made only after a. neutral magistrate gives due consideration tó any argument and evidence that are proper.” Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329, 1332 (Fla.1990), holding modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 708-09 (Fla.1991), receded from on other grounds by Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063, 1066 (Fla.1992).
green Weiss v. State (1998)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Lyles, 576 So.2d at 708 (emphasis supplied).
emphasis supplied
green Pease v. State (1997)
Rule Authority · Fla.
In State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 708-09 (Fla.1991), Justice Overton wrote that the justification for this Court's holding in Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), was that the written reasons for departure had to be entered before the appeal could be filed and the time for appeal begins to run on the date the sentencing judgment is filed.
green Knowles v. State (1995)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
We remand to the trial court for clarification as to when the scoresheet was actually prepared, see State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 708 (Fla.1991), 2 as well as for clarification of the reasons for departure reflected on the scoresheet, which we find to be ambiguous.
green Bonney v. State (1993)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
At least two of the court’s reasons were valid in this case: defendant threatening the victim and her children after the commission of the offenses, see State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 708 (Fla.1991), and his escalating pattern of criminal activity, see Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259, 261 (Fla.1992).
green Seals v. State (1992)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 709 (Fla.1991).
green Jordan v. State (1999)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Lyles, 576 So.2d at 708 . [10] Here the oral reasons were pronounced on the date of sentencing.
green Maddox v. State (2000)
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 708-09 (Fla.1991).
green Maddox v. State (2000)
Cited · Fla. · signal: see
See State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 708-09 (Fla. 1991).
green Colbert v. State (1994)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Mock v. State, 625 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (citing State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991)); Williams v. State, 607 So.2d 478, 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (written reasons filed three days after sentencing is reversible error).
written reasons filed three days after sentencing is reversible error
green Ciuros v. State (1994)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); see also Hall v. State, 598 So.2d 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
green Timonere v. State (1994)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); Barry v. State, 626 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Hall v. State, 598 So.2d 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
green Faulk v. State (1993)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); see also Hall v. State, 598 So.2d 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
green Barry v. State (1993)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1829 (Fla.1990), modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); see also Hall v. State, 598 So.2d 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
green Sanders v. State (1993)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991). .
green Campbell v. State (1993)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991).
green Shaw v. State (1993)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified on other grounds by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991).
green Blair v. State (1992)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 707 (Fla.1991).
green Bush v. State (1992)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329, 1331 (Fla.1990), modified on other grounds, State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); see also § 921.-001(6), Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6), (d)(11).
green State v. Greene (1991)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); State v. Williams, 576 So.2d 281 (Fla.1991); Brown v. State, 565 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).