Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1949–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rich v. Con-Stan Industries, Inc.green1 sentence2009App. 1990) (recognizing and enforcing temporaiy injunction of Guatemalan court freezing half the funds in defendant’s Florida bank accounts); Rich, 449 S.W.2d at 327 (“[E]ven if this judgment cannot be given effect under the full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution” because it is not technically a final judgment or “for any of *1109 the reasons herein stated, we find that the California judgment can be given credit under the doctrine of comity.”). | 1 | 1 |
Intrinsic Values Corp. v. Superintendenciagreen1 sentence2009E.g., Intrinsic Values Corp. v. Superintendencia, 806 So. 2d 616, 619 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
Perrenoud v. Perrenoudgreen2 sentences1998See, e.g., Perrenoud v. Perrenoud, 206 Kan. 559, 573 , 480 P.2d 749 (1971); Boyce v. Boyce, 13 Kan. 1998See, e.g., Perrenoud v. Perrenoud, 206 Kan. 559, 573 , 480 P.2d 749 (1971); Boyce v. Boyce, 13 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Marina Mezitis Diorinou v. Nicholas H.E. Mezitis
green
1 sentence2021In Diorinou, a Greek court implicitly ruled that the mother's retention of the children in Greece was not wrongful and explicitly stated that the grave risk exception in Article 13 would apply even if the retention were wrongful. 237 F.3d at 144 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Marriage of Salas v. Salas
green
1 sentence2005Edward argues tire case is controlled by Salas, 28 Kan. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Boyce v. Boyce
green
1 sentence1998See, e.g., Perrenoud v. Perrenoud, 206 Kan. 559, 573 , 480 P.2d 749 (1971); Boyce v. Boyce, 13 Kan. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Ponzi v. Fessenden
green
2 sentences1949In Ohrazada v. Turner, supra, in a somewhat analogous situation, we said in the syllabus (¶ 3): “Where sentences imposed by state and federal courts are both in full force and effect and authorized officials of the respective governments, pursuant to recognized doctrine of comity, grant priority of custody to each other for sentence serving purposes the prisoner has no voice in the matter.” In Ponzi v. Fessenden, 258 U. S. 254, 260 , 66 L. 1949In Ohrazada v. Turner, supra, in a somewhat analogous situation, we said in the syllabus (¶ 3): “Where sentences imposed by state and federal courts are both in full force and effect and authorized officials of the respective governments, pursuant to recognized doctrine of comity, grant priority of custody to each other for sentence serving purposes the prisoner has no voice in the matter.” In Ponzi v. Fessenden, 258 U. S. 254, 260 , 66 L. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.